检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李国山[1] LI Guo-shan(School of Philosophy,Nankai University,Tianjin 300350,China)
机构地区:[1]南开大学哲学院,天津300350
出 处:《河北学刊》2023年第1期48-57,共10页Hebei Academic Journal
基 金:2021年度国家社会科学基金重点项目“维特根斯坦主要著作释义与研究”(21AZX012)。
摘 要:随着新维特根斯坦派的兴起,如何从总体上把握《逻辑哲学论》的思想再度成为学术讨论的热点。新旧各种解读意见之间的争论主要围绕维特根斯坦为何要将自己书中的命题视作没有意思的空谈而展开。传统解读者大都倾向于认为,尽管构成《逻辑哲学论》的命题本身没有任何意思,但通过它们可以显示出形而上学真理。而新维特根斯坦派则认为,应果断地将这些命题看作是不仅毫无意思而且也无法显示任何东西的纯粹空谈。这些针锋相对的解读意见虽各有道理,却未能足够细致地考察维特根斯坦用“我的命题”这一短语到底意指他书中的哪些命题。而只要严格按照该书所使用的命题编码系统,不仅从纵向而且从横向上看待这些命题之间的层次区分与相互关联,便可望寻得一条全面理解该书思想的有效途径。With the rise of the New Wittgenstein School, how to grasp the thought of Logical Philosophy as a whole has once again become the focus of academic discussion.Most traditional readers tend to believe that although the propositions that constitute the Theory of Logical Philosophy have no meaning in themselves, they can show the metaphysical truth through them.The New Wittgenstein School believes that these propositions should be decisively regarded as pure empty talk that is not only meaningless but also unable to show anything.As long as the proposition encoding system used in the book is strictly followed and the hierarchical distinction and correlation between these propositions are viewed not only vertically but also horizontally, an effective way to comprehensively understand the ideas of the book can be expected.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117