从“体育是什么?”到“体育哲学是什么?”——始于“电子竞技是否体育”争议的思考  

From"What is Sport"to"What is Philosophy of Sport"——An Inquire from"Whether E-Sports is a Sport"

作　　者：高强[1,2] 徐凡 汪维 季浏[1] GAO Qiang;XU Fan;WANG Wei;JI LIU(School of PE and Health,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200241;Sino-French Joint Research Center of Sport Science,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200241)

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学体育与健康学院,上海200241 [2]华东师范大学中法体育科学研究中心,上海200241

出　　处：《成都体育学院学报》2023年第1期29-37,共9页Journal of Chengdu Sport University

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“人类命运共同体视域下全球体育治理的中国智慧和方案”(20&ZD335);2021年度本科生创新创业培育项目(2021PY-136)。

摘　　要：“电子竞技是否是体育”的争议不仅仅是在体育概念层面上的是与否之争,而牵涉了如何在哲学层面上规整人对体育进行思考的思维方式问题。中国传统道家思想与存在主义理论的创见将体育哲学中的概念之争转向了体育哲学的科学合法性思考,具体展现对“体育哲学何以可能”的讨论。它一方面形成了“体育与哲学结合何以可能”的讨论,导向了体育哲学思维方式批判与转向;一方面形成了“体育与哲学应当如何结合”讨论,导向了体育哲学思维方式的内在辩证逻辑和历史逻辑的分析与展开。对思维方式的重建,使“电子竞技是否是体育”的问题得到了疏解,也使体育哲学的思维方式从“对体育的”思考跃升为“在体育中”的思考。The controversy of"whether E-Sports is a sport"is not only a debate on the conceptual level of sport,but also involves how to regulate human thinking mode about sport at the philosophical level.The originality of Chinese traditional Taoist thought and existentialism theory turns the concept debate in philosophy of sport to the thinking of the scientific legitimacy of philosophy of sport,and specifically shows the discussion of"how philosophy of sport can be possible".On the one hand,it forms the discussion of"how can the combination of sport and philosophy be possible",which leads to the criticism and turn of the thinking mode of philosophy of sport;On the otherhand,it forms the discussion of"how to combine sport and philosophy",which leads to the analysis and development of the internal dialectical logic and historical logic of the thinking mode of philosophy of sport.The reconstruction of the thinking mode,has solved the question of"whether E-Sports is a sport"and promoted the thinking mode of philosophy of sport from"thinking about sport"to"thinking in sport".

关 键 词：电子竞技 体育 思维方式 体育哲学 

分 类 号：G80[文化科学—运动人体科学]