非法经营罪“口袋化”的预防进路:实质违法性及其展开  

A Preventive Approach to the “Pocketization” of Illegal Business Crimes:Substantial Illegality and Its Development

作　　者：陆凌[1] 王吉祥 LU Ling;WANG Ji-xiang(Guangxi University,Nanning 530004,China)

机构地区：[1]广西大学法学院,南宁530004

出　　处：《北京警察学院学报》2022年第6期47-52,共6页Journal of Beijing Police College

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“正当防卫司法认定规则实证研究与理论重述”(项目编号:20BFX059);教育部人文社科青年基金项目“美国规范量刑改革考察(1970S-2010S)及中国之鉴”(项目编号:16YJC820023)。

摘　　要：非法经营罪在司法实践中容易出现“口袋化”,学界目前提出的解决思路不能为司法机关提供明确和有效的指引。为了预防该罪的“口袋化”,必须基于该罪的犯罪构成要件合理界定其实质违法性。在实质违法性分析中引入社会性评价要素后可知,此罪以强化市场准入监管为规制核心。在引入市场准入法律制度这一其他法律评价要素的基础上,根据我国《市场准入负面清单》,通过刑法教义学限缩路径,可以将此罪的实质违法性界定为经营者擅自进入7类行业和领域进而造成对市场秩序的实质性扰乱。The crime of illegal business operation is prone to “pocketing” in judicial practice, and the solutions put forward by the academic community at present cannot provide clear and effective guidance for the judicial organs. The prevention of “pocketing” of the crime should be based on the constitutive elements of the crime to reasonably define its substantive illegality. After introducing social evaluation elements into the analysis of substantive illegality, it can be seen that this crime takes strengthening market access supervision as the core of regulation. On the basis of introducing the legal system of market access, according to the “Negative List of market access”, through the reduction of the doctrine of criminal law, the essence of irregularity of this crime can be defined as the operator’s unauthorized entry into seven categories of industries and fields and thus causing substantive disruption to the market order.

关 键 词：非法经营罪 “口袋化” 实质违法性 市场准入 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]