检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张晓燕 ZHANG Xiaoyan(Liangfeng Kindergarten of Zhangjiagang City,Suzhou 215600 China)
出 处:《学前教育研究》2023年第1期91-94,共4页Studies in Early Childhood Education
基 金:江苏省苏州市教育科学“十四五”规划立项课题“幼儿园生活环节与课程整合培植幼儿生活力的实践研究”(编号:2021/LX/02/332/01)。
摘 要:同伴冲突蕴含了丰富的幼儿发展机会,教师在幼儿解决同伴冲突的过程中给予正确的引导非常重要。然而,对当前教师应对幼儿同伴冲突方式的调查却发现,教师主要通过直接判断、询问当事幼儿或第三方的方式了解幼儿同伴冲突起因,多数教师没有关注幼儿同伴冲突行为。“权威仲裁”是教师最常使用的处理方式。这使教师应对方式总体呈现出经验性特点,反映了教师对幼儿同伴冲突的发展价值认识不足。教师应对幼儿同伴冲突的正确方式应是充分赋权幼儿,关注幼儿同伴冲突的解决过程,通过引导幼儿深度思考、自我表达和共同协商,支持幼儿主动解决同伴冲突,并从中获得社会性、认知、情绪等多方面的发展。Developmental chances in peer conflicts are invaluable to children,and teachers’guidance in the process of resolving such conflicts is very important as well.The investigation on teachers’coping style when they were faced with children’s peer conflicts showed that they often delt with children’s peer conflicts based on their own educational experience and did not fully recognize the developmental values of peer conflicts for children.The correct way for teachers to cope with children’s peer conflicts is to empower children to resolve peer conflicts by themselves,during which teachers can help children think more deeply,express their views and feelings more clearly,and negotiate with each other more proactively.
分 类 号:G612[文化科学—学前教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33