民事执行救济制度体系化的逻辑基础与路径选择  

The Logical Basis and Path Choice of the Systematization of Civil Execution Relief System

作　　者：陈衍桥 Chen Yanqiao

机构地区：[1]中山大学法学院,广东广州510220

出　　处：《河南大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第6期66-70,154,共6页Journal of Henan University(Social Sciences）

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“我国债务人异议之诉体系化研究”(22CFX017)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：民事执行救济制度是一个基础而复杂的理论命题,同时是一个契合了权利救济与权力制约功能原理的科学规范体系。民事执行救济制度的体系化有着理论与实践的双重需求,执行理论自身的自洽性与系统性提供了执行救济制度体系化的理论根据,形式多样的瑕疵执行行为构成了执行救济制度体系化的事实基础。执行救济制度的体系化绝不是一种从理论到理论的简单演绎,更要践行一种制度对现实的理性回应。“程序”与“实体”的划分与关联是民事执行救济制度体系化的路径选择,充分尊重执行实践中实体争议与程序争议的本质差异,在保证执行救济中实体问题与程序问题相分离的基础上构建一个程序与实体相互补充、相互配合的二元救济体系,从而实现对程序权利和实体权利的全方位救济。The civil enforcement relief system is a basic and complex theoretical proposition,and it is also a scientific and normative system in line with the functional principles of right relief and power restriction.The systematization of the civil enforcement relief system has the dual needs of theory and practice.The self-consistent and systematic nature of the enforcement theory provides the theoretical basis for the systematization of the enforcement relief system.Various forms of defective enforcement behavior constitute the factual basis for the systematization of the enforcement relief system.The systematization of enforcement relief system is not a simple deduction from theory to theory,but also a rational response to reality.The division and connection of“procedure”and“entity”is the path choice for the systematization of civil enforcement relief system.It fully respects the essential differences between substantive disputes and procedural disputes in execution practice.On the basis of ensuring the separation of substantive issues and procedural issues in execution relief,it constructs a binary relief system in which procedure and entity complement and cooperate with each other,so as to realize the comprehensive relief of procedural rights and substantive rights.

关 键 词：执行救济 违法执行 不当执行 体系化 路径 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]