体育学博士科研潜力评价——基于112位体育学博士H指数与G指数的分析  

Evaluation of Scientific Research Potential of Doctors of Physical Education——Based on the Analysis of the H index and G index of 112 PhDs in Physical Education

作　　者：张华玉 魏德样[1] ZHANG Huayu;WEI Deyang(School of Sports Science,Fujian Normal University,Fuzhou,Fujian 350117)

机构地区：[1]福建师范大学体育学院,福建福州350117

出　　处：《武夷学院学报》2022年第12期74-79,85,共7页Journal of Wuyi University

摘　　要：以中国知网全文数据库作为数据源,通过H指数和G指数评价我国体育学博士的科研潜力,采用文献资料法、数理统计法和逻辑分析法,对2015年我国培养的112位体育学博士学位获得者的毕业院校类型、性别、专业方向和在读年限进行差异性分析。结果显示:2015年毕业的体育学博士中将近40%的博士H指数、G指数为0;(2)各体育学博士的H指数和G指数在不同院校类型中的均值存在显著性差异,且综合类院校的均值远远大于体育类院校和师范类院校,而在性别、专业方向和在读年限上的H、G指数均值都不存在显著性差异。研究可见各体育学博士H指数和G指数整体偏低,科研水平参差不齐,各体育学博士之间的科研潜力区分度较差,可比性较弱。Using the CNKI full-text database as the data source,the H-index and G-index are used to evaluate the scientific research potential of Ph D students in physical education,using literature method,mathematical statistics and logical analysis method,the difference analysis of the type,gender,professional direction and number of years of study of the 112 PhD degree holders cultivated in my country in2015 was carried out.The results show that:(1)Nearly 2/5 of the PhDs in physical education graduated in 2015 have a H index and G in-dex of 0.(2)There are significant differences in the mean values of the H index and G index of each PhD in physical education in differ-ent types of colleges,and the mean value of comprehensive colleges is much larger than that of sports colleges and normal colleges.How-ever,there are no significant differences in the mean values of the H index and G indexes in terms of gender,professional direction,and years of study.Conclusion:The H index and G index of the physical education doctors are generally low,and the scientific research level is uneven;the scientific research potential of the physical education doctors is poorly distinguished and the comparability is weak.

关 键 词：体育学 博士培养 科研评价 H指数 G指数 

分 类 号：G80-32[文化科学—运动人体科学]