检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:滕浩源 毕同辉 TENG Haoyuan;BI Tonghui(School of Management,Hefei University of Technology,Hefei 230009,China)
出 处:《物流科技》2023年第3期133-139,共7页Logistics Sci-Tech
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(72131006)。
摘 要:在生态供应链的背景下,基于企业品牌对需求量的影响,并考虑消费者通过生态系统的联系进行额外购买行为,构建制造商与生态链核心企业在代工和自营合作模式下的博弈模型,比较了两种模式下的企业利润与最优决策。研究结果表明:双方将根据品牌价值的相对大小选择合作方式,且存在无法合作的情况,核心企业需要进行协调;额外购买带来的回报收益会提高企业的利润与投入,并倾向于自营。制造商进行销售努力越有效,越容易选择自营模式;系统投入对制造商品牌产品的适配效果越差,越容易选择代工模式。In the context of ecological supply chain, we consider the influence of brand on demand and consumers’ additional purchase behavior through the connection of the ecosystem, construct a game model between the manufacturer and the core enterprise. And compare the profit and optimal decision of the enterprise under two cooperation modes, which the manufacturer maintains its own brand(self-run) and acts as an OEM. The results show that: The two parties will choose the cooperation mode based on relative brand value, in the absence of cooperation, core enterprises need to coordinate;the return from additional purchases will increase the profit and investment of the enterprise, and tend to choose self-run mode. The more effective the manufacturer’s sales effort, the easier it is to choose the self-run mode;the worse the adaptation effect of system input to the manufacturer’s brand product, the easier it is to choose the OEM mode.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249