检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:冉奥博 RAN Ao-bo
机构地区:[1]清华大学智库中心 [2]清华大学城市治理与可持续发展研究院
出 处:《社会学评论》2023年第1期61-83,共23页Sociological Review of China
基 金:深圳市人文社会科学重点研究基地(社会治理与创新研究中心)的支持。
摘 要:第三方参与社区治理是中国基层社会治理的重要议题。文章在专长研究视角下,提出专长平衡、专长边界、专长冗余三个关联概念,讨论社会组织有效参与的专长逻辑,以加强专长理论与社会组织研究的对话。以万象中心为个案的研究发现:专长并非由社会组织所独占,社区治理存在多个专家和多种专长;贡献专长是社会组织的立身之本,交互专长可以突破专长边界,情境专长是社区治理共同体形成的基础;社会组织的有效参与需要平衡多种专长、避免专长冗余、建构专长边界。在社会组织、政府、民众沉浸到具体情境中共同学习,社会组织通过参引实现跨界运用专长并形成新领域时,专长边界被消解,承认和尊重专长成为可能。但同时,各个主体又在自发建构专长边界,而这种建构存在着权力异化。The participation of the third sector in community governance is an essential issue in China’s grassroots social governance. From the perspective of the studies of experience and expertise(SEE), the article proposes three related concepts, including expertise balance, expertise boundary, and expertise redundancy. Then, this paper discusses the expertise logic behind the effective participation of the third sector, hoping to strengthen the dialogue between SEE and social organization research. Based on the case study of Wanxiang Center, we find that social organizations do not exclusively own expertise, and multiple experts owing a variety of expertise exist in community governance. Contributory expertise is the foundation of social organizations;interactional expertise can break through the boundaries among expertise;contextual expertise is the foundation for forming the community of community governance. Balancing multiple expertise, avoiding expertise redundancy, and constructing expertise boundaries guarantee effective participation of social organizations. Social organizations, public sectors, and citizens immerse themselves in specific situations to learn together;social organizations realize the cross-boundary application of expertise and create new fields through referring expertise. These activities dissolve the boundaries and enable the recognition of expertise. Simultaneously, multiple actors spontaneously and individually construct the boundaries, though alienated by their power, to realize cooperation.
分 类 号:D669.3[政治法律—政治学] D632.9[政治法律—中外政治制度]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.200.8