对弗洛伊德“trieb”的误解及相关遗留问题的辨析  

The Misunderstanding to Freud’s "Trieb" and the Identification of Related Legacy Issues

作　　者：张腾 刘振[1] ZHANG Teng;LIU Zhen(School of Traditional Chinese Medicine,School of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine,Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine,Nanjing 210046,China)

机构地区：[1]南京中医药大学中医学院•中西医结合学院,江苏南京210046

出　　处：《医学与哲学》2022年第23期43-48,共6页Medicine and Philosophy

基　　金：2018年国家社会科学基金重大项目(18ZDA322);2021年江苏省社会科学基金青年项目(21ZXC003)。

摘　　要：从弗洛伊德经典理论的角度出发,采用质性研究方法,主要基于弗洛伊德文本,对不同精神分析流派对弗洛伊德理论中驱力(trieb)概念的理解进行比较研究,探索出弗洛伊德经典理论被混淆的驱力与本能两个概念的区别、分析产生这一混淆的原因、分析了这一混淆会导致的对弗洛伊德理论的误解、讨论了对弗洛伊德理论中与驱力相关的一些重要概念的翻译问题,明确驱力概念在弗洛伊德理论中的重要地位。此外,梳理了驱力与相关的两个重要概念本能、力比多之间的关系。From the perspective of Freud’s classical theory, this paper adopts a qualitative research method, mainly based on Freudian texts, to conduct a comparative study on the understanding of the concept of drive in Freud’s theory by different schools of psychoanalysis. It explores the difference between confused concepts of drive and instinct in Freud’s classical theory, analyzes the reasons and misunderstanding of Freud’s theory that may result from this confusion, discusses the translation of some important concepts related to drive in Freud’s theory, and clarifies the prominent position of drive concept. In addition, the relationship between drive and two important related concepts, instinct and Libido, is sorted out.

关 键 词：弗洛伊德 精神分析 驱力 本能 

分 类 号：R-05[医药卫生]