检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:来小鹏[1] 王一鸣 Lai Xiaopeng;Wang Yi Ming
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学民商经济法学院
出 处:《电子知识产权》2023年第1期35-47,共13页Electronics Intellectual Property
摘 要:版权的公共利益属性为版权公益诉讼的存在提供了正当性依据,然而版权公益诉讼的制度构造不甚明晰,尤其是版权公益诉讼的受案范围缺乏合理的界定标准。依据法解释学分析,版权公益诉讼的受案范围取决于版权领域“公共利益”的界定。从法律逻辑学的视角,分析版权“公共利益”的内涵和外延,即可界定版权“公共利益”,从而提出版权公益诉讼受案范围的界定标准。本文提出采用“概括+列举”的方式界定版权公益诉讼的受案范围,“概括式”是版权公益诉讼受案范围的实质判断标准,即版权“公共利益”的认定,“列举式”则提出了损害版权领域“公共利益”的一些表现形式。这种界定标准既提供了原则性指引,保留了一定的解释空间,又列举了部分具体案件类型,有助于明确受案范围边界、提高裁判效率。The public interest nature of copyright provides a legitimate basis for the existence of copyright public interest litigation.However,the institutional structure of copyright public interest litigation is not clear,especially the scope of copyright public interest litigation lacks a reasonable definition standard.Through the analysis of legal hermeneutics,the scope of accepting cases of copyright public interest litigation depends on the definition of"public interest"in the field of copyright.From the perspective of legal logic,by analyzing the connotation and extension of copyright"public interest",we can define copyright"public interest",and then put forward the standard for defining the scope of copyright public interest litigation.This paper proposes to use the method of"summarization+enumeration"to define the scope of copyright public interest litigation.Some manifestations of damage to the"public interest"in the copyright field.This definition standard not only provides principled guidance,reserves a certain space for interpretation,but also enumerates some specific case types,which helps to clarify the boundaries of the scope of accepting cases and improve the efficiency of adjudication.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38