以述为作:中国哲学史研究的态度转换  

Taking narration as creation: Attitude change in the study of Chinese philosophy history

作　　者：王雪梅 王宝峰 Wang Xuemei;Wang Baofeng

机构地区：[1]西北大学哲学学院,陕西西安710127

出　　处：《东岳论丛》2022年第12期73-80,191,192,共10页DongYue Tribune

摘　　要：由胡适《中国哲学史大纲》(卷上)与冯友兰《中国哲学史》开创并延续至今的“宁疑毋信”之“疑古”态度和“述学”方法,造成了中国五千年文明却对应着“打个对折”的中国哲学史,以及蔑弃经学从而断灭中国传统思想根脉的严重学术后果。中国哲学史研究要“走出疑古时代”,当首先解构启蒙理性不加区别地批判传统、权威及经典的迷思;并以孔子“述而不作,信而好古”整理“六经”、返本开新的精神,以及王国维“二重证据法”科学理性的建设性态度,实现中国哲学史研究的“态度转换”,重建学理合法的整全的中国哲学史。The attitude of “doubting the ancient” and the method of “stating learning”of “doubting rather than believing”,which were created by Hu Shi’s Outline of the History of Chinese Philosophy( Volume I) and Feng Youlan’s History of Chinese Philosophy(Volume Ⅰ and Volume Ⅱ) and continue to this day,have caused the serious academic consequences that China’s five thousand year civilization always corresponds to the history of Chinese philosophy with“a half twist”,and that China’s traditional ideology has been destroyed by disdaining Confucian classics. The study of the history of Chinese philosophy should “go out of the age of suspicion of antiquity”,first of all,with the insight of modern western philosophers,deconstruct the enlightenment reason and then indiscriminately criticize the myth of tradition,authority and classics;And finally,with Wang Guowei’s constructive attitude of “double evidence method” of scientific rationality,and Confucius’ s attitude of “telling but not doing,believing in and admiring the ancients” of sorting out the “Six Classics” and returning to the original and opening up new ones,we will jointly realize the “attitude transformation” of the study of the history of Chinese philosophy and rebuild the legal and integrated history of Chinese philosophy.

关 键 词：疑古 二重证据法 返本开新 态度转换 

分 类 号：B21[哲学宗教—中国哲学]