1840年代俄国文坛的“莱蒙托夫之争”及其文学史意义  

The Dispute of Lermontov’s Works in the 1840s and Its Significance in the History of Russian Literature

作　　者：唐丁仪 谢周[1] Tang Dingyi;Xie Zhou

机构地区：[1]西南大学外国语学院

出　　处：《俄罗斯文艺》2023年第1期88-99,共12页Russian Literature & Arts

基　　金：2021年度国家社会科学基金重大项目“多维视域下的俄罗斯文化符号学研究”(21&ZD276)的阶段性成果;“西南大学创新研究2035先导计划”资助,项目批准号:SWUPilotPlan023。

摘　　要：1840年代的“莱蒙托夫之争”是莱蒙托夫学的起步阶段,别林斯基、舍维廖夫等文学批评家围绕莱蒙托夫的作品展开激烈论战,他们的评论思路被视为传统莱蒙托夫学的两大源头。本文在梳理当年“莱蒙托夫之争”的主要内容的基础上,一方面从文学创作与文学批评二者之间互动与对话的角度,探讨“莱蒙托夫之争”对于别林斯基本人美学思想的转化,以及对于俄罗斯文学和文学批评思想的发展所具有的方向性意义;另一方面,本文结合舍维廖夫的历史哲学系统,揭示文学史上消极的保守派在莱蒙托夫学术史上所具有的积极意义。The dispute of Lermontov’s works in the 1840s marked the starting stage of Lemontov Studies. Literary critics such as Belinsky and Shevyrev engaged in a fierce debate over Lermontov’s works, and the ideas of their criticism are regarded as the two major sources of traditional Lemontov Studies. On the basis of combining the main contents of Lermontov’s works dispute and analyzing the position between two sides,this paper, from the perspective of the interaction and dialogue between literary creation and literary criticism, that the dispute of Lemontov’s works guides the way for the transformation of Berlinsky’s aesthetic thought and the development of Russian literature and literary criticism. On the other, according to Shevyrev’s historical philosophy system,this paper reveals the positive significance of the Lemontov’s comments of negative conservative critics in the history of literature.

关 键 词：莱蒙托夫 别林斯基 舍维廖夫 俄国文学史 

分 类 号：I512.06[文学—其他各国文学]