检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高传勇 GAO Chuanyong(Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200240)
出 处:《中国高教研究》2023年第1期85-92,共8页China Higher Education Research
摘 要:近年来,越来越多中国高校借鉴美国大学终身教职制度开展长聘教职制度改革,已经成为高校教师聘任制改革的重要趋势。美国大学终身教职制度的逻辑起点是以职业安全保障大学教师的学术自由,其制度设计契合高校作为学术创新型组织对于教师激励的内在要求,为吸引、遴选和激励优秀人才提供了有效的制度保障;该制度有其内在局限性及其适用范围,面对社会各界批评与质疑,美国高校开始采取多种举措对该制度进行改革完善。中国高校应准确把握终身教职制度内在逻辑,客观认识其制度优势和内在局限,从中国高校发展和改革现实出发,合理借鉴其制度内核,突破教师聘任制度改革难点,逐步建立与中国高校发展实际相适应的教师聘任制度。In recent years, more and more universities in China promote the reform of tenure system by learning from the experience of American universities,which has become important trend of the reform of the university faculty appointment system in China. The logical starting point of the tenure system is to ensure the academic freedom of university teachers,and its system design conforms to the internal requirements of universities as academic innovative organizations for faculty motivation, and provides an effective system guarantee for attracting, selecting and motivating outstanding talents. The system has its inherent limitations and scope of application. Faced with criticism and doubts from society, American universities began to take various measures to reform and improve the system. Universities in China should understand the inherent logic, objectively recognize the advantages and limitations of tenure system, and reasonably learn from its institutional core, break through the bottleneck in the reform and gradually establish the faculty personnel system that is compatible with the actual situation of Chinese universities.
分 类 号:G64[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.128.226.211