检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王江峰 徐森[1] 徐秀芳[1] 花小朋[1] 皋军[1] 安晶 WANG Jiangfeng;XU Sen;XU Xiufang;HUA Xiaopeng;GAO Jun;AN Jing(School of Information Engineering,Yancheng Institute of Technology,Yancheng Jiangsu 224002,China)
机构地区:[1]盐城工学院信息工程学院,江苏盐城224002
出 处:《盐城工学院学报(自然科学版)》2022年第4期51-56,共6页Journal of Yancheng Institute of Technology:Natural Science Edition
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(62076215)。
摘 要:聚类成员簇个数的选择对聚类集成的结果有显著影响,但目前尚无此方面的系统研究。因此,通过系统比较不同的簇个数选择方法,确定较优的聚类成员簇个数选择方法。首先对5种常见的簇个数设置方法及其性能进行分析与比较。结果表明,当簇个数k等于实际标签数k*时,得到的聚类集成结果最好。进一步探索更优的簇个数设置方法,从k*~2k*中选取6个较短的区间作为簇个数的选取范围,并将聚类集成的结果与使用k*得到的结果进行比较。在基准数据集上的实验结果表明,当聚类成员簇个数与真实标签数据集中的类数相等时,获得的聚类集成效果最好。The clusternumber of cluster members has a significant impact on the results of cluster ensemble. However, there is no systematic research in this area at present. Therefore, by systematically comparing different cluster number selection methods, the better cluster number of cluster members selection method is determined. Firstly, five common cluster number setting methods and their performances are analyzed and compared.Experimental results show that the best the performance of clustering ensemble is obtained when the number of clusters is equal to the real number of labels k*. A better method is further explored to set the number of clusters, select 6 shorter intervals from k*~2k*as the selection range of the number of clusters, and the results of cluster ensemble with those obtained by using k*is compared. The experimental results on the benchmark dataset show that when the cluster number of cluster members is equal to the cluster number of clusters in the real label dataset, the cluster ensemble is the best.
分 类 号:TP181[自动化与计算机技术—控制理论与控制工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.14.144.145