检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:叶青[1] 徐明敏[2] YE Qing;XU Mingmin
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学 [2]华东政法大学诉讼法学研究中心
出 处:《中共中央党校(国家行政学院)学报》2023年第1期146-157,共12页Journal of The Party School of The Central Committee of The C.P.C(Chinese Academy of Governance)
摘 要:人民陪审员制度根植于中国特色社会主义法治实践的沃土,融汇了世界司法文明和民主价值理念,在人民司法制度体系中闪耀着夺目的司法民主光辉。近年来,我国人民陪审员制度在立法和实践层面取得诸多新成果和新发展。但从人民陪审员参审过程和程度等方面实证数据分析,人民陪审员制度在司法实践中发挥的功能仍然有待强化,应从强化理念、严控范围、保障权利和完善配套四个方面进一步探索,完善人民陪审员全过程实质参审的现实路径。The people's juror system is rooted in the fertile soil of the socialist rule of law practice with Chinese characteristics,integrates the world's judicial civilization and democratic values,and shines with dazzling judicial democracy in the people's judicial system.In recent years,the people's juror system in China has made many new achievements and developments in legislation and practice.However,the empirical data analyses of the process and extent of the people's jurors’participation in the trial reveal that,the function of the people's juror system in judicial practice still needs to be strengthened.It should be further improved from such four aspects as strengthening the idea,strictly controlling the scope,protecting rights,and improving the supporting facilities so as to improve the practical path of the people's jurors'substantive participation in the whole process.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43