检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谢莉琴[1] 秦盼盼[1] 胡红濮[1] Xie Liqin;Qin Panpan;Hu Hongpu(Institute of Medical Information,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,Beijing,100020,China;不详)
机构地区:[1]中国医学科学院医学信息研究所,北京100020
出 处:《中国医院管理》2023年第2期33-35,共3页Chinese Hospital Management
基 金:首都医科大学国家医保研究院开放性课题(YB2022B01)。
摘 要:应用多源流理论解释异地就医结算政策工具的选择逻辑,试图回答为什么会发生政策演变、其驱动因素是什么。结果显示,在异地就医结算政策工具的选择过程中,存在着3种溪流:长期以来,异地就医引发的问题引发了公众和媒体的关注;各级政府部门在省内异地就医结算工作中积累了丰富的实践经验;2016年“两会”前夕,网络舆情和有利的政治力量出现,推动了直接结算政策之窗的开启。It used the multiple-streams theory to explain the choice logic of policy tools for cross-pooling healthcare,trying to answer why this policy evolution occurred and what are the driving factors. The results are as follows.There were three kinds of streams in the process of selecting the policy tools for cross-pooling healthcare. For a long time,the problems caused by cross-pooling healthcare had aroused the attention of the public and the media.The governments had accumulated practical experiences in the settlement of cross-pooling healthcare within the province. On the eve of two sessions in 2016,network public opinions and political forces appeared,which finally promoted the opening of the policy window for immediate settlement of reimbursement.
分 类 号:R197.1[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.127