三股道上走的车?——新时期文论研究、作家批评与诗学建构的分离及统合的可能性  

A Vehicle on Three Divergent Paths? Separation and Possibility of Integration of Literary Theory Studies, Authorial Criticism and Poetics Construction in the New Period

作　　者：汪正龙[1] WANG Zhenglong

机构地区：[1]南京大学文学院

出　　处：《中国文艺评论》2023年第1期25-36,I0001,共13页China Literature and Art Criticism

基　　金：2019年度国家社科基金重大项目“改革开放40年文学理论学术史研究及文献整理”(项目批准号:19ZDA262)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：新时期文论研究、作家批评与诗学建构分别体现了元理论诉求,观察、创造素质以及文学史视野,三者原本可以视为文艺学或文学原理的不同知识形态,却形成了事实上的隔阂、分离乃至对立。实际上,各民族早期的文论、批评与诗学是三位一体的。甚至可以说,文论、批评与诗学的关系,在一定程度上体现了文学理论、文学批评与文学史的关系,而这一点可能事关文艺学、文学原理这个学科、这门知识的理据。理论家、作家和诗人作为一个文学共同体,构成了特殊的差异性对话和主体间性关系。作家批评与诗人诗学,作为理论家的外位视角对文学的思考,提供了理论研究不易发现的问题或对盲点的认知,三者融合可形成“大文艺学”的视野、架构与格局。In the new era, studies on literary theory, authorial criticism and poetic constructions manifest the appeal of metatheory, creative quality, the perspective of literary history, the importance of observation and the standard of creation. The three aspects could have been regarded as different intellectual formations of literary theory or principles;however, they were separated and viewed as antagonistic. In fact, these three were all one in the early times, and the relationship between literary theory, criticism and poetics manifests the relationship between critical practice and literary history. This relationship is closely relevant to the fundamentals of the discipline of literary studies. Theorists, writers and poets as a literary community have constituted the inter-subjective relations and otherness. The authorial criticism and poetic studies, as the external perspective on literature, bolster the lacunas of relative theories, and form the vision and structure of “literary theory in a broader sense”.

关 键 词：文学理论 作家批评 诗学 

分 类 号：I0[文学—文学理论]