检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:沈悦[1] 安磊 Shen Yue;An Lei(School of Economics and Finance,Xi’an Jiaotong University;School of Economics and Business Administration,Chongqing University)
机构地区:[1]西安交通大学经济与金融学院 [2]重庆大学经济与工商管理学院
出 处:《南开管理评论》2022年第6期86-96,I0018,I0019,共13页Nankai Business Review
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目(22ZDA053);国家自然科学基金项目(72203028);中国博士后科学基金项目(2022M710537)资助。
摘 要:本文利用企业负债水平表征债务约束力强弱,以2007-2018年中国实体部门上市企业作为研究样本,从企业金融资产持有“规模”和“结构”两个维度,考察债务约束在抑制企业“脱实向虚”方面所起的作用。研究发现:第一,从规模上看,债务约束明显地抑制了企业金融资产持有规模,主要表现在现金类金融资产上;从结构上看,债务约束驱动企业提高了风险类金融资产的相对比重,债权治理未能发挥有效的治理功能。第二,相较于短期负债与银行贷款,长期负债以及因商业信用而形成的负债对企业金融资产持有表现出更优的治理效应。第三,因国有企业面临更为严重的“债务软约束”问题和较低的外部盈利压力,国有产权属性会明显弱化债务约束与企业金融资产持有之间的关系。第四,当外部盈利压力和产品市场竞争压力较高时,债务约束对企业风险类金融资产持有规模的抑制效应变弱,对企业增加风险类金融资产持有比重的驱动作用增强。本文研究为防范实体企业“脱实向虚”和完善负债的相机治理机制提供了有益参考。In recent years, China’s economy has been experiencing an obvious problem of over-financialization, which has attracted widespread attention from policy makers, scholars and market practitioners as well. One of the important manifestations is that the scale of financial assets held by non-financial enterprises has increased rapidly. Against this background, many Chinese scholars have carried out a lot of research on driving factors and crowding-out effects of enterprises’ over-financialization. However, from the micro perspectives of scale and structure of enterprises’ financial asset holdings, there is very little literature discussing the governance mechanism of this issue. The contingent governance role of debt financing is one of the most concerned micro-governance mechanisms. This paper takes debt governance as the entry point to investigate its role in restraining enterprises’ over-financialization?Theoretical speaking, if the debt governance mechanism is effective, the increase of financial leverage intensifies the financial constraints faced by managers, which would encourage managers to allocate investment to projects that are beneficial for the long-term development of enterprises, reduce the scale of financial assets holdings, and restrain enterprises’ over-financialization. However, due to the soft budget constraints of bank loans and the profitability pressure from the capital market in China, managers faced with debt repayment pressure also have the motivation to increase financial investment in order to maintain short-term profits and prevent stock prices from being undervalued. When the two forces mentioned above exist at the same time, debt constraints may help to limit the scale of financial asset held by enterprises, but they can also drive enterprises to change the structure of financial asset holdings and increase the proportion financial assets with higher risk and return.To throw light on the relationship between debt constraints and enterprises’ over-financialization, this pape
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222