从革命到治理:中国马克思主义美学话语形态探析  

From Revolution to Governance:An Analysis of Chinese Marxist Aesthetics Discourse Form

作　　者：张良丛 ZHANG Liang-cong(School of Literature,Yangtze Normal University,Chongqing 408100,China)

机构地区：[1]长江师范学院文学院,重庆408100

出　　处：《内蒙古社会科学》2023年第1期131-137,共7页Inner Mongolia Social Sciences

基　　金：教育部哲学社会科学重大攻关项目“马克思主义美学的话语体系的历史演变和范式转换研究”(编号:22JZD005);教育部人文社科规划项目“审美资本主义批判的理论演进与美学问题重构”(编号:19XJA751009)。

摘　　要：中国马克思主义美学生发于本土的文化政治实践活动中,形成了以党和国家领导人的文艺思想为主线、其他理论阐释为副线的文化领导权理论。革命时期,中国马克思主义美学主要以革命话语形态出现,凸显了文艺的阶级性、战斗性,形成了革命的文艺观和文艺服从政治的功能观。社会主义建设时期,中国马克思主义美学主要以治理话语形态出现,强调了文艺的社会主义属性和党的文化领导权,建构起人民性的内涵。从中国马克思主义美学的整体形态看,革命话语形态和治理话语形态并不是对立的,而是相互依存的。中国马克思主义美学生发于审美政治的问题域,既是马克思主义普遍原理与中国不同历史阶段的实践活动的结合,也是中国马克思主义者文化政治实践的产物。Chinese Marxist aesthetic are born in the local cultural and political practice,and forming the theory of cultural leadership with the Party and state leaders’thoughts on literature and art as the main line and the interpretation of other theories as the secondary line.In the revolutionary period,it appeared in the form of revolutionary discourse,highlighting the class and fighting nature of literature and art,forming the revolutionary concept of literature and art and the function of literature and art subject to politics.In the period of socialist construction,it appeared in the form of governance discourse,emphasizing the socialist attribute of literature and art and the cultural leadership of the party,and constructing the connotation of the people.From the perspective of the integrity of Chinese Marxist aesthetics,revolutionary discourse form and governance discourse form are not opposites,both of which are the theoretical origin of the political nature of literature and art,and share the same problem domain.They are the combination of Marxist principles and Chinese specific social practice,and the result of Chinese Marxist cultural and political practice.

关 键 词：中国马克思主义美学 革命话语 治理话语 

分 类 号：I01[文学—文学理论]