生态修复性司法在环境犯罪中的应用--以广东省为例  

Application of Restorative Justice in the Field of Environmental Resource Crime--Taking Guangdong Province as an Example

作　　者：张继钢 苗秋月 ZHANG Ji-gang;MIAO Qiu-yue(Guangdong Ocean University,Zhanjiang,Guangdong,China,524088)

机构地区：[1]广东海洋大学,广东湛江524088

出　　处：《广东开放大学学报》2022年第6期56-64,共9页JOURNAL OF GUANGDONG OPEN UNIVERSITY

基　　金：广东海洋大学2021年度国家社科培育项目“粤港澳大湾区环境犯罪的刑法治理调试研究”(C21815)。

摘　　要：生态修复性司法有利于实现惩罚犯罪、修复生态和保护被害人利益等多重目标,能有效弥补传统环境刑法的不足。通过对广东省有效裁判文书进行实证分析发现,生态修复性措施呈现出地域分布不均、适用罪名较少、修复方式单一、修复程序衔接不畅及专业化水平略低和配套保障措施不足等现实问题。法律规定不完善、不精细、缺乏相应的配套保障机制是主要原因。应从国家立法层面完善生态修复法律规定,将生态修复责任方式作为非刑罚处罚措施纳入刑法,扩大适用范围,完善程序法和实体法的衔接,注重专业人才培养,构建联动“司法链”,加大监督力度,以促进生态修复司法发挥最佳效用。Ecological restorative justice is conducive to the realization of multiple goals such as punishing crimes,restoring ecology,and protecting the interests of victims,which can effectively make up for the deficiency of traditional criminal law.Through the empirical analysis of effective judgment documents in Guangdong province,it is found that ecological restoration measures present some practical problems,such as uneven geographical distribution,few applicable charges,single restoration methods,poor connection of restoration procedures,slightly low level of specialization and insufficient supporting measures.The main reason is that the legal provisions are not perfect,imprecise and lack of corresponding supporting guarantee mechanism.It’s necessary to improve the law from the level of national legislation,stipulate the ecological restoration responsibility approach as the non-penalty penalty measure in the criminal law,expand the scope of application of ecologically recoverable justice,improve the connection between procedural law and substantive law,pay attention to the training of professional talents,build a linkage"judicial chain",and increase supervision,so as to achieve the best effect of ecological restoration justice.

关 键 词：环境犯罪 生态修复性司法 非刑罚措施 刑事和解 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]