“中国法律阐释学”的建构  

The Construction of“Chinese Legal Hermeneutics”

作　　者：陈金钊[1] Chen Jinzhao

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学法律方法研究院,上海201620

出　　处：《探索与争鸣》2022年第12期84-100,211,共18页Exploration and Free Views

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“新兴学科视野中的法律逻辑及其拓展研究”(18ZDA034)。

摘　　要：在中国阐释学的体系中应有法律阐释学的位置。以辩思为特征的法律解释学之缺陷,是法律阐释学建构的理论起点。中国法律阐释学之建构,需要以据法阐释为基础,同时兼容辩思解释,重点是在法思维中嵌入更多的逻辑因素,即在辩证思维中介入逻辑、在整体思维中加入体系、在实质思维中植入形式。现代法治是基于逻辑方法的拟制,据法阐释是基本的思维方式。以辩思为基础形成的法律解释学,对规范法学方法缺乏足够重视,以致逻辑规则对思维的指引效果不彰;不承认法律独立性的关系思辨,会使法律失去应有的权威。要改变这种状况,需要改造法律解释学,进而形成中国本土的法律阐释学。Legal hermeneutics has its importance in the system of Chinese hermeneutics.The shortcomings of legal hermeneutics characterized by dialectical thinking constitute the theoretical starting point for the construction of legal hermeneutics.The construction of legal hermeneutics in China should based on legal interpretation and compatible with dialectical interpretation.In other words,logic is involved in dialectical thinking,system is added in overall thinking,and form is implanted in substantive thinking.Modern rule of law is based on logical method of mimesis,and interpretation according to law is the basic way of thinking.Legal hermeneutics formed on the basis of dialectical thinking lacks sufficient attention to normative jurisprudential methods,so that the effect of logical rules on guiding thinking is not obvious.Relational thinking that does not recognize the independence of law will cause law to lose its proper authority.To change this situation,it is necessary to transform legal hermeneutics,and form a Chinese indigenous legal hermeneutics.

关 键 词：法律解释学 法律阐释学 法律思维 法治思维 法治逻辑 

分 类 号：D920.0[政治法律—法学]