检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蔡秋茂 吴文强 王欣 黄奕祥[4] 朱宏 CAI Qiu-mao;WU Wen-qiang;WANG Xin;HUANG Yi-xiang;ZHU Hong(School of Public Health,Southern Medical University,Guangzhou,510515,China;不详)
机构地区:[1]南方医科大学公共卫生学院,广州510515 [2]南方医科大学第一临床医学院,广州510515 [3]福建师范大学公共管理学院,福州350315 [4]中山大学公共卫生学院,广州510080
出 处:《中国卫生经济》2023年第1期14-18,共5页Chinese Health Economics
基 金:国家重点研发计划项目(2020YFC2006400);国家社会科学基金项目(18BGL218)。
摘 要:目的:基于混合政策工具视角评估县域医共体改革措施及实施效果。方法:以广东省阳西县为例,结合定性和定量数据分析其实施医共体改革前后(2017—2019年)的医疗服务能力、医疗资源利用及就医流向等情况。结果:混合政策工具在县域医共体改革中产生了积极效应。权威性和激励性政策工具的行使优化了县域医共体内部资源配置,并在医疗费用控制、双向转诊制度、医疗服务格局优化等方面发挥了一定作用。而能力性政策工具则提升了县域医共体在组织、管理、资源、服务等诸多方面的综合能力,为改革中达成多元目标奠定了基础。同时,多种政策工具同时使用会形成一定的张力和冲突,在地方政府主导的县域医共体改革中,对权威性工具的过度依赖会制约激励性工具的成效。结论:县域医共体改革应使得权威性和激励性政策工具相得益彰,在合理地去行政化前提下,充分发挥医保支付政策中市场激励作用,并发挥学习性政策工具优势,加强政府对县域医共体的监管和绩效考核。Objective:To analyze the reform measures and outcomes of the county-level medical alliance from the perspective of mixed policy tools.Methods:Taking Yangxi County in Guangdong Province as the object to carry out a case study,qualitative and quantitative data was applied to analyze the medical service capacity,medical resource utilization and patient flow before and after the reform of the medical alliance from 2017 to 2019.Results:Mixed policy tools have produced positive effects in the reform of county-level medical alliance.The authority and incentive tools optimized the internal resource allocation of the county medical alliance,and played a role in the control of medical expenses,the dual referral system,and the optimization of the medical service pattern.The capacity tools enhanced the comprehensive capabilities of the county medical alliance in terms of organization,management,resources,and services,which laid the foundation for the achievement of multiple goals.Meanwhile,the simultaneous use of multiple policy tools will inevitably lead to certain conflicts and tensions.In the county-level medical alliance reform led by local governments,excessive reliance on authoritative tools will restrict the effectiveness of incentive tools.Conclusion:Further reform of county-level medical alliance should make authority and incentive tools complement each other.Under the premise of rational de-administration,the government should give full play to the market incentives of medical insurance payment policies and develop learning policy tools,and strengthen the supervision and performance appraisal of the county-level medical alliance.
分 类 号:R1-9[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学] R19-0
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42