检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高明生[1] 吴忠广[2] 张振虎 田万利 朱强 GAO Ming-sheng;WU Zhong-guang;ZHANG Zhen-hu;TIAN Wan-li;Zhu Qiang(Jiangsu Provincial Transportation Engineering Construction Bureau,Nanjing 210004,China;Research Center for Standards and Metrology,China Academy of Transportation Sciences,Beijing 100013,China;School of Civil and Resource Engineering,University of Science&Technology Beijing,Beijing 100083,China)
机构地区:[1]江苏省交通工程建设局,江苏南京210004 [2]交通运输部科学研究院标准与计量研究中心,北京100013 [3]北京科技大学土木与资源工程学院,北京100083
出 处:《交通运输研究》2023年第1期105-114,共10页Transport Research
基 金:江苏省交通工程建设局科技项目(2021(平广扩)055;2021(平广扩)243)。
摘 要:为提高高速公路改扩建工程交通安全风险评估结果的确定性和准确性,建立了基于改进D-S证据理论的相关风险评估模型。首先建立包含24个影响因素的三层级评估指标体系;然后利用云模型(Cloud Model,CM)求出定性指标的基本信度赋值(Basic Probability Assignment,BPA),利用高斯隶属度函数求出定量指标BPA;接着,通过层次分析法确定各评估指标的权重,进而对各指标BPA进行加权;利用D-S证据理论融合加权后的BPA,归一化处理后得到改扩建工程交通安全风险状态评估结果。最后,为验证模型的准确性,选取沪陕高速公路平潮至广陵段高速公路改扩建工程作为实例进行交通安全风险评估。评估结果显示,实例工程的低风险水平隶属度最大,为0.6615,表明该实例总体处于低风险水平,与现有资料和现实情况吻合。同时发现,基于CM、AHP及D-S证据理论的评估模型对各评估指标进行量化、加权、融合后所得到的风险等级隶属度和不确定性有所区别,能更均衡地表示风险的隶属度,量化后的安全风险状态评估结果具有更好的准确性,解决了指标体系中模糊定性指标难以量化表征及指标差异化权重赋值的难题。In order to improve the certainty and accuracy of traffic safety risk assessment results of expressway reconstruction and expansion project,a related risk assessment model based on improved D-S evidence theory was established.Firstly,a three-level evaluation index system including 24 influencing factors was established.Secondly,the Basic Probability Assignment(BPA)of the qualitative index was calculated using Cloud Model(CM),and the BPA of quantitative index was calculated using Gaussian membership function.The weight of each evaluation index was determined by the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP),and BPA was weighted for each index.D-S evidence theory was used to integrate the weighted BPA,and the normalized treatment was used to obtain the traffic safety risk state assessment results of the reconstruction and expansion project.Finally,in order to verify the accuracy of the model,the highway reconstruction and expansion project of Pingchao to Guangling section of Shanghai-Shaanxi Expressway was selected as an example to evaluate the traffic safety risk.The evaluation results showed that the membership degree of low risk level was 0.6615 and was the largest,indicating that the case was at the low risk level,which is consistent with the existing information and reality.The result also showed that the risk level membership and uncertainty obtained by the evaluation model based on CM,AHP and D-S evidence theory after quantization,weighting and fusion of each evaluation index were different,which could represent the risk membership more balanced,and the security risk status evaluation results after quantization had better accuracy.The difficulty of quantifying the fuzzy qualitative index and assigning different weights to the index system was solved.
关 键 词:交通安全 改扩建工程 风险评估 层次分析 云模型 D-S证据理论
分 类 号:U418.8[交通运输工程—道路与铁道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30