论国内在“刑事诉讼目的”概念界定中的问题  

On Problems in Defining the Concept of‘the Purpose of Criminal Proceedings’in China

作　　者：高勇[1] Gao Yong(Politics and Law School of Yichun University,Yichun Jiangxi 336000,China)

机构地区：[1]宜春学院政法学院,江西宜春336000

出　　处：《衡阳师范学院学报》2023年第1期70-75,共6页Journal of Hengyang Normal University

摘　　要：国内在“刑事诉讼目的”概念的界定上,主要存在以下问题:界定不统一,界定含糊甚至错误。“刑事诉讼目的”是刑事诉讼领域的核心概念,其界定问题会对该领域产生重大影响:一是直接影响刑事诉讼目的理论,如果界定不当,则会使该理论失去合理的研究对象和正当的前提;二是影响其它刑事诉讼理论和刑事诉讼实践,导致它们失去确定的、正确的理念指引。对“刑事诉讼目的”概念的界定,一要避免重复国内学者在该概念界定上的失误,二要尊重该概念在其理论来源中的原意,宜将“刑事诉讼目的”直接界定为“刑事诉讼法的目的”。The Chinese researchers have the following problems in defining the concept of“the purpose of criminal proceedings”:the definition is not uniform;the definition is vague;the definition is wrong.“The purpose of criminal proceedings”is the core concept of the field of criminal proceedings,these problems of its definition have had a serious impact in this field.First,it is to directly affect the theory of the purpose of criminal proceedings,leading to the theoretical study of the purpose of criminal proceedings loses its reasonable object and premise.Second,it affects the other criminal proceedings theory and criminal procedure practice,leading to the loss of the guidance of the correct concept.To define the concept of“the purpose of criminal proceeding”as“the purpose of criminal procedure law”directly not only can avoid repeating the mistakes made by Chinese researchers in the definition of the concept,but also can take into account its original meanings in its theoretical source.

关 键 词：“刑事诉讼目的”界定 刑事诉讼目的 立法者目的 刑事诉讼法目的 

分 类 号：DF73[政治法律—诉讼法学]