从知识到思想:中国古代文论学科话语的后古典范式转型  

From Knowledge to Thought:The Postclassical Paradigm Transformation of the Discipline Discourse of Ancient Chinese Literary Theory

作　　者：时胜勋[1] Shi Shengxun

机构地区：[1]北京大学中文系,北京100871

出　　处：《南京社会科学》2023年第1期131-139,共9页Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences

基　　金：北京市社科基金项目“中华美学精神的当代传承研究”(20ZXB003)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：中国古代文论既是知识,也是思想。从思想角度探讨中国古代文论有助于中国文论的整体自觉。中国古代文论思想性包括学科、学术、文化和社会维度。在20世纪90年代以来的中国古代文论学科反思与拓展中,这些都有体现,并积累了不少有益的经验。中国古代文论学科话语已经进入了不同于单纯知识的新发展态势,即后古典范式转型。在这一范式转型中,知识学、方法论、价值观、精神性构成其核心内容,学科反思、学术反思、文化反思与社会反思构成其主要方向。从知识到思想的后古典范式转型,对中国古代文论学科、当代中国文论研究以及文化复兴与中国特色哲学社会科学话语体系建设有积极的启示意义。Ancient Chinese literary theory is both knowledge and thought. The discussion of ancient Chinese literary theory from the thoughtful perspective contributes to the overall consciousness of Chinese literary theory. The thoughtful of ancient Chinese literary theory includes discipline, academic, cultural and social dimensions. In the reflection and expansion of the discipline of ancient Chinese literary theory since the 1990s, all these have been reflected, and a lot of useful experience has been accumulated. The discipline discourse of ancient Chinese literary theory has entered a new development trend different from pure knowledge, that is, postclassical paradigm transformation. In this paradigm transformation, knowledge, methodology, values and spirituality constitute its core contents, while discipline reflection, academic reflection, cultural reflection and social reflection constitute its main direction. The postclassical paradigm transformation from knowledge to thought has positive implications for the discipline of ancient Chinese literary theory, contemporary Chinese literary theory research, cultural revival and the construction of the discourse system of philosophy and social science with Chinese characteristics.

关 键 词：中国古代文论 学科话语 知识 思想 后古典范式转型 

分 类 号：I206[文学—中国文学]