刑民交叉案件中同一性标准的认定  

The Standard of Identity in Cases with Criminal Civil Overlap

作　　者：王超凡 WANG Chao-fan(Capital Equity Legal Group Shanghi Firm,Shanghi,201199,China)

机构地区：[1]京衡律师集团上海事务所,上海201199

出　　处：《天津法学》2022年第4期103-112,共10页Tianjin Legal Science

摘　　要：刑民交叉案件中同一性标准主要包括两种观点,一是同一法律事实、同一法律关系标准,二是同一自然事实或行为标准。但两种标准都有不足之处,需要对同一性标准重新进行界定。从文义与逻辑而言,刑民交叉案件中的同一性标准应当是指同一事实,确切的说是指同一自然事实或行为,但考虑到该标准的不足之处,有必要对其进行目的性限缩。考察刑民交叉案件同一性标准的规范目的,其与刑事追缴、退赔制度相衔接,意在以避免刑民重复和冲突的方式合理解决被害人的民事权利救济问题,符合同一自然事实或行为的情形还必须以实现该规范目的为条件。是否符合规范目的需要对民事案件进行实体审理,刑民交叉案件作为特殊类型案件,其程序与实体密不可分。There are two main views concerning the standard of identity in cases with criminal and civil overlap: the first is the standard of identical legal facts and identical legal relationship;the second is the standard of identical natural facts or behavior. However, both standards are defective, and the standard of identity needs to be redefined. In terms of context and logic, the standard of identity in cases with criminal and civil overlap should refer to identical facts, or precisely the same natural facts or behavior. However, considering the deficiencies of this standard, it is necessary to limit it purposefully. According to the normative purpose of the standard of identity in cases with criminal and civil overlap, it, connecting to criminal recovery and refund system,aims to reasonably resolve the civil rights relief for victims in a way avoiding criminal and civil repetition and conflict. The circumstances consistent with the same natural facts or behavior should also be conditional on realizing the normative purpose. Whether the circumstances agree with the normative purpose requires a substantive hearing of the civil case. As a special type of case, the procedure and entity of cases with criminal and civil overlap are inseparable.

关 键 词：同一法律事实 同一法律关系 同一事实 规范目的 实体审理 

分 类 号：D915[政治法律—诉讼法学]