检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周玙娇 周玲艳 徐秀丽[1] 廖建伟[1] 张晶[1] ZHOU Yujiao;ZHOU Lingyan;XU Xiuli(The Third Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Zhengzhou,450000)
出 处:《实用癌症杂志》2023年第3期485-487,共3页The Practical Journal of Cancer
摘 要:目的 探讨局部皮瓣修复对头面部非黑色素瘤皮肤癌一期切除术后患者的修复效果。方法 回顾性收治84例头面部非黑色素瘤皮肤癌并行一期切除术患者的临床资料,按患者术后修复方案的不同分为两组。其中予以拉拢缝合修复的42例患者为对照组,给予局部皮瓣转移修复的42例患者为观察组,观察至术后7 d。对比两组修复效果、美观满意度。结果 观察组修复总有效率、美观满意度较对照组高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 相较于拉拢缝合修复,局部皮瓣转移修复对头面部非黑色素瘤皮肤癌一期切除术后患者的修复效果更佳,美观满意度更高,值得推广应用。Objective To investigate the value of local flap repair in patients with non melanoma skin cancer after one-stage resection.Methods Clinical data of 84 patients with non melanoma skin cancer of head and face were retrospectively analyzed.The patients were divided into 2 groups according to different postoperative repair schemes.Among them, 42 patients who were repaired by pull suture were the control group and 42 patients who were repaired by local flap transfer were the observation group, which were observed until 7 days after operation.The repair effect and aesthetic satisfaction of the 2 groups were compared.Results The total effective rate and aesthetic satisfaction of the observation group were higher than those of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with retraction suture repair, local flap transfer repair has better effect and higher aesthetic satisfaction in patients after primary resection of head and face non melanoma skin cancer, which is worthy of popularization and application.
关 键 词:头面部非黑色素瘤皮肤癌 一期切除术 局部皮瓣修复 拉拢缝合 修复效果
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30