检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张志英[1] 刘腾飞 ZHANG Zhiying;LIU Tengfei(School of Law,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001,China)
出 处:《河南工程学院学报(社会科学版)》2023年第1期67-72,共6页Journal of Henan University of Engineering(Social Science Edition)
摘 要:合作式诉讼在世界范围内生机勃勃,迸发出无尽的活力,国际社会的司法理念与纠纷解决方式正在逐步从对抗走向合作,从单赢走向共赢。我国在多次司法改革和实践中摸索出了属于自己的合作式司法道路。2018年《刑事诉讼法》确立的认罪认罚从宽制度,以及逐渐兴起的企业合规制度,都昭示着我国刑事司法的缓慢转型。当然,合作式司法能够兴起的最主要原因在于激励,即给予双方急需之物以收到息诉止争之效。Cooperative litigation is full of vigor and vitality all over the world, leading to a shift in judicial philosophy and dispute resolution worldwide from confrontation to cooperation and from zero-sum ends to win-win results. China is also exploring its own cooperative judicial path through many rounds of judicial reform and practice. The leniency system of guilty plea established in the Criminal Procedure Law in 2018 and the emerging corporate compliance system both indicate that China is undergoing a gradual transformation in criminal justice. The main reason for the rise of cooperative justice is incentives, which can settle the dispute because they meet the desperate need of both sides.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49