检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周彦华[1] ZHOU Yanhua(Research Center for Contemporary Visual Art,Sichuan Fine Arts Institute,Chongqing 401331,China)
机构地区:[1]四川美术学院视觉艺术研究院,重庆401331
出 处:《西南大学学报(社会科学版)》2023年第2期242-252,共11页Journal of Southwest University(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:重庆市艺术科学规划重点项目“抗战时期重庆地区艺术参与乡村建设史料整理与研究”(22ZD08),项目负责人:周彦华;重庆市教委人文社科一般项目“艺术介入社会的中国特色社会主义审美经验研究”(22SKGH274),项目负责人:周彦华;重庆市社科重庆英才计划“包干制”项目“中国当代社会介入性艺术的‘社会主义遗产’研究”(2022YC051)项目负责人:周彦华。
摘 要:“去欧洲中心化转向”是目前国际学界研究艺术介入的热点视角。它重新审视了20世纪艺术介入与国际无产阶级运动的关系。国际无产阶级运动形成的“国际主义”思潮,深刻地影响了当时的艺术介入实践和理论。它一方面以大众化的、低技术性的视觉形式鼓励无产阶级的参与,塑造无产阶级的主体性,从而反抗布尔乔亚趣味;另一方面,又以一种现实主义的手法,联合非西方世界的国家,批判殖民主义和帝国主义,建造新世界。艺术介入的国际主义体现在它“低可视性”和“直接现实主义”的国际主义视觉形式和杂糅先锋派美学反帝国主义与殖民文化的国际主义美学。这种国际主义美学同时也是一种让可感性进行分配的政治实践。中国的艺术介入属于20世纪初的国际主义艺术实验的一部分,它在将此种实验体制化的过程中逐渐成熟,形成了一种地方性的中国特色的艺术介入范式。它区别于今天西方民主政治主导的艺术介入,成为当代艺术介入的去欧洲中心化转向的典范。“The De-Eurocentric Turn” is a cutting-edge study of artistic engagement in international scholarship. It re-examines the relationship between artistic engagement and the international proletarian movement in the 20th century. The thought of internationalism formed by the international proletarian movement profoundly influenced the practice and theory of artistic engagement at the time. On the one hand, it encourages the participation of the proletariat in popular and low-tech visual forms, and shapes the proletariat’s subjectivity, so as to resist Bourgeois taste. On the other hand, in a realistic way, it united non-Western countries, criticized colonialism and imperialism in order to build a new world. The internationalism of artistic engagement is embodied in its “low visibility” and “direct realism” of visual forms of internationalism and its internationalist aesthetics that mixes avant-garde aesthetics and anti-imperialist and colonial cultures. This internationalist aesthetic is also a political practice that allows for the distribution of sensibility. Artistic engagement in China is a part of the internationalist art experiments in the early 20th century. It gradually grows in the process of institutionalizing such experiment which formed a local engaged paradigm with Chinese characteristics. Such paradigm distinguishes itself from today’s democratic politically dominated art interventions in the West and serves as a model for the de-Eurocentric turn in contemporary art interventions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7