检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭烁 Guo Shuo
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学诉讼法学研究院
出 处:《复印报刊资料(诉讼法学、司法制度)》2022年第12期18-34,共17页
基 金:国家社科基金重点项目“大数据侦查的程序控制与证据适用研究”(19AZD024)的阶段性成果;中国政法大学青年教师学术创新团队支持计划“行政法典立法研究”(21CXTD07)资助。
摘 要:上诉审体系中上诉理由的缺失,是当下上诉不加刑原则适用产生困惑的根源。上诉理由具有“事实”与“说理”双重要素。前者体现不告不理之诉审原则,划定了上诉不加刑在罪行方面的适用范围;后者构成被追诉人对上诉审裁判的合理预期,为了保障审级制度目的充分实现,立法必须采取措施禁止超出被追诉人合理预期且不利于被追诉人的突袭性裁判。对上诉不加刑原则更为准确的理解是:上诉审法院可以在上诉审范围内对超出上诉理由“说理”要素的部分作出裁判,但这部分裁判不得加重被追诉人的刑罚。上诉不加刑原则的适用基准从来不是“上诉由谁提起”,而是“被追诉人对上诉审裁判的合理预期如何”。在为被告人利益抗诉案件中,检察官的抗诉理由有利于被追诉人,此时加重处罚显然不符合“不利于被告人的预期外裁判禁止理论”,上诉审裁判应受上诉不加刑原则的约束。The lack of appeal reason in the appellate system is the root cause of the confusion in the application of the principle of no increase of penalty on appeal.An appeal reason contains the dual elements of"facts"and"reasoning".The former reflects the principle of no trial without complaint and defines the applicable scope of the principle of no increase of penalty on appeal,while the latter constitutes the"reasonable expectation"of the accused on the appellate judgment.In order to ensure the full realization of the purpose of the trial level system,the legislature must take measures to prohibit surprise judgments that exceed the appellant's"reasonable expectation"and are not favorable to the accused.A more accurate understanding of the principle of no increase of penalty on appeal is that the court of appeal may make a judgment on the part beyond the"reasoning"element of the appeal reason within the scope of appeal,which should not increase the penalty of the accused.The application standard of the principle of no increase of penalty on appeal has never been"who filed the appeal",but"what the reasonable expectation of the accused on the appeal judgment is".In a case of protest for the interest of the defendant,the reason for the prosecutor's protest is in favor of the accused.In such a case,an increase of penalty obviously does not conform to"the theory of prohibition of unexpected judgment against the defendant",and the appellate judgment is bound by the principle of no increase of penalty on appeal.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171