检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王洁 叶当前 WANG Jie;YE Dang-qian(School of Humanities,Anqing Normal University,Anqing Anhui 246133,China)
出 处:《菏泽学院学报》2023年第1期104-108,125,共6页Journal of Heze University
基 金:国家社科基金项目(19BZW063)。
摘 要:柏拉图和刘勰虽然所处的时代背景以及文化体系存在一定差异,但二者的文学创作论仍具有很强的可比性。在文学创作的灵感问题上,二人都持肯定见解,但柏拉图强调神赋,刘勰强调人赋;在文学创作与外物的关系问题上,柏拉图忽视人的主观能动作用,刘勰则深刻阐述物我之间的互动,凸显主体意义;在读者问题上,柏拉图将文学接受视为单向输出的过程,刘勰则看到听众的再创造性,对读者提出相应要求。Although there were certain differences in the background and cultural system of the times, Plato’s and Liu Xie’s literary creation theories were still highly comparable. In terms of the literary creation inspiration, both of them held positive views. However, Plato emphasized the divine while Liu Xie emphasized the human. In the relationship between literary creation and external objects, Plato ignored the subjective and dynamic role of human beings, while Liu Xie profoundly expounded the interaction between things and oneself, highlighting the main significance. In terms of readers, Plato regarded literary acceptance as a process of one-way output, while Liu Xie found the audience’s recreativity and put forward corresponding requirements for readers.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.216.110.162