老年人居住权益的司法保障与社会法因应  

Judicial Protection and Social Legal Response of the Elderly’s Residential Rights and Interests

作　　者：刘彦 胡卫[1] LIU Yan;HU Wei(School of Law,Guizhou University,Guiyang,550025,China)

机构地区：[1]贵州大学法学院,贵州贵阳550025

出　　处：《南京中医药大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第2期106-115,共10页Journal of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：居住权兼具社会保障功能和经济功能,为预防和降低居家养老伦理风险、实现“老有所养、老有所居”提供了理性选择。司法实践中,对旅居养老型居住使用权的处理不同于居住权,应肯认事实形成或法院裁判即可成立居住权关系。为填补权益保护空缺,应保护老年人居住权的期待利益,同时将私法规则转化为公法保障,将居住权明确纳入老年人权益保障法保护范围,惩戒侵犯老年人居住权益行为。The right of residence has both social security and economic function, which provides a rational choice for preventing and reducing the ethical risk of home-based care, along with realizing the goal of "ensuring old-age support and residence". In judicial practice, the usufruct of sojourn-based care for the elderly was handled differently from the residence right. The relationship of residence right can be established by admitting the formation of facts or court decisions. In order to fill the gap in the protection of rights and interests, the expected interests of the elderly’s residence right should be protected. Meanwhile, the rules of private law should be transformed into the public law protection, which explicitly includes the residence right in the protection scope of the elderly’s rights and interests protection law, and punishing violations of the elderly’s residential rights and interests.

关 键 词：居家养老 居住权 期待利益 公法化 

分 类 号：D923.2[政治法律—民商法学] D923.8[政治法律—法学]