检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:钱淑红 姜英杰[1] 杨冰雨 谢媚[3] QIAN Shuhong;JIANG Yingie;YANG Bingyu;XIE Mei(Faculty of Education,Northeast Normal University,Changchun 130024,China;Northeast Forestry University,Harbin 150040,China;Hunan University,Changsha 410082,China)
机构地区:[1]东北师范大学教育学部,长春130024 [2]东北林业大学,哈尔滨150040 [3]湖南大学,长沙410082
出 处:《中国心理卫生杂志》2023年第4期349-353,共5页Chinese Mental Health Journal
基 金:黑龙江高等教育教学改革项目(SJGZ20200011);2021年东北林业大学教育教学研究项目(DGYSZ2021-02);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目资助(2572020BX02)。
摘 要:目的:检验思维控制问卷(TCQ)测评大学生人群的效度和信度。方法:选取847名大学生,随机分成2部分,样本1(n=422)进行探索性因子分析,样本2(n=425)进行验证性因子分析;另外选取228名大学生(样本3),采用强迫量表修订版(OCI-R)、中文版思维压抑量表(WBSI)进行效标效度检验,间隔6周后对其中98名大学生进行重测。结果:探索性因子分析共抽取5个公因子,分别为转移注意力、惩罚、重新评价、担忧和社交控制;验证性因子分析表明5因子模型的拟合指数较好(χ^(2)/df=1.53,CFI=0.97,TLI=0.97,SRMR=0.05,RMSEA=0.04);TCQ总分与OCI-R、WBSI得分均正相关(ICC=0.42、0.46,均P<0.01)。总问卷的Cronbachα系数为0.78,各因子的Cronbachα系数为0.72~0.86;总问卷的重测信度(ICC)为0.83,各因子的重测信度为0.69~0.82。结论:思维控制问卷测评大学生群体显示有较好的效度和信度。Objective:To evaluate the validity and reliability of Thought Control Questionnaire(TCQ)in Chinese college students.Methods:A total of 847 college students was randomly divided into two parts.Exploratory factor analysis was performed on sample 1(n=422),and confirmatory factor analysis was performed on sample 2(n=425).A total of 228 college students(sample 3)were selected for the criterion validity test by using the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised(OCI-R)and the White Bear Suppression Inventory(WBSI),and 98 of them were retested 6 weeks later.Results:The exploratory factor analysis found 5 factors named distraction,punishment,reappraisal,worry and social control.The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the 5-factor model fitted well(χ^(2)/df=1.530,CFI=0.972,TLI=0.967,SRMR=0.052,RMSEA=0.035).The scores of the thought control questionnaire were positively correlated with the OCI-R and WBSI scores(ICC=0.42,0.46,Ps<0.01).The Cronbach alpha coefficients were 0.78 for the total questionnaire and 0.72-0.86 for each dimension.The retest reliabilities were 0.83 for the total questionnaire and 0.69-0.82 for each dimension.Conclusion:The Thought Control Questionnaire has good validity and reliability in Chinese college students.
分 类 号:B841.7[哲学宗教—基础心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222