不同拥挤度下正畸模型手工测量和数字化测量的可靠性评价研究  

Reliability evaluation of manual and digital measurements for orthodontic models under different crowding degrees

作　　者：尹小旋 甘红琴 田瑞雪[1] 谢小飞[1] YIN Xiaoxuan;GAN Hongqin;TIAN Ruixue;XIE Xiaofei(Stomatology Department,the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College,Bengbu,Anhui 233004,China)

机构地区：[1]蚌埠医学院第一附属医院口腔科,安徽蚌埠233004

出　　处：《中华全科医学》2023年第3期409-412,共4页Chinese Journal of General Practice

基　　金：安徽省高校自然科学研究项目(KJ2021A0790);蚌埠医学院自然科学重点项目(BYKY2019019ZD)。

摘　　要：目的评估不同拥挤程度下牙颌模型数字化测量的可靠性、准确性,以明确数字化模型测量在口腔正畸临床工作中的应用前景。方法选取2020年9月—2021年9月在蚌埠医学院第一附属医院口腔正畸科就诊患者30副正畸石膏记存模型,并扫描石膏模型获得30副数字化模型。依据拥挤度的大小划分为轻度(拥挤度≤4 mm)、中度(4 mm<拥挤度≤8 mm)和重度拥挤组(拥挤度>8 mm),每组各10副模型。石膏模型用游标卡尺测量相关参数,数字化模型用相应软件测量,比较2种测量方法在测量相关参数时所得结果之间存在的差异。结果轻度拥挤组中,7个测量值之间的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05):14、36、44、46牙位的牙冠宽度、上颌牙弓前段长度、下颌牙弓后段长度、腭穹高度;中度拥挤组中,9个测量值之间的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05):16、26、36、45、46牙位的牙冠宽度、上颌牙弓前段长度、下颌牙弓中段长度、覆合、测量时间;重度拥挤组中,10个测量值之间的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05):15、13、12、11、23、43牙位的牙冠宽度、上颌牙弓后段宽度、下颌牙弓中段长度、覆合、测量时间,但以上结果所存在的差异均<1 mm。结论牙列的拥挤程度虽对数字化模型的测量结果具有一定的影响,但并不影响临床正畸方案制定,数字化模型测量可替代传统的手工测量方法在临床上应用。Objective To evaluate the reliability and accuracy of digital measurement of dental model under different levels of crowding,so as to clarify the application prospect of digital model measurement in orthodontic clinical work.Methods A total of 30 sets of orthodontic plaster were selected as storage models in the Department of Orthodontics of the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College from September 2020 to September 2021,and 30 digital models were obtained by scanning the gypsum model.According to the crowding degree,they were divided into mild group(crowding degree≤4 mm),moderate group(4 mm<crowding degree≤8 mm)and severe crowding group(crowding degree>8 mm),with 10 models in each group.The gypsum model was measured with vernier caliper,and the digital model was measured with corresponding software.The difference between the results of the two measurement methods when measuring relevant parameters was compared.Results In the mild crowding group,the difference between the 7 measurement values was statistically significant(P<0.05):crown width,maxillary anterior arch length,mandibular posterior arch length,and palatal dome height at 14,36,44,and 46 positions.In the moderately crowded group,the difference between nine measurements was statistically significant(P<0.05):Crown width,anterior length of maxillary arch,middle length of mandibular arch,overlaying,and measurement time at 16,26,36,45,46 positions.In the severe crowding group,the difference between the 10 measurements was statistically significant(P<0.05):15,13,12,11,23,43 tooth position crown width,maxillary posterior arch width,mandibular arch middle length,overlying,measurement time.However,the difference between the above results was less than 1 mm.Conclusion Although the degree of dentition crowding has a certain influence on the measurement results of the digital model,it does not affect the development of clinical orthodontic plan.The digital model measurement can replace the traditional manual measurement method in clinical applicatio

关 键 词：数字化模型 模型测量 可靠性 重复性 

分 类 号：R783.5[医药卫生—口腔医学]