检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:褚福民 CHU Fumin(Key Laboratory of Evidence Science,CUPL,Ministry of Education,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China)
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学证据科学教育部重点实验室,北京100088
出 处:《法学论坛》2023年第2期25-36,共12页Legal Forum
摘 要:法院参与企业合规改革的基本路径,包括量刑程序、撤回起诉程序以及未来可能构建的企业缓刑制度。在量刑程序中,法院对检察机关主导的企业合规成效进行审查、确认;撤回起诉程序为审判阶段的企业合规需求提供了实现途径,但是不同改革思路中法院参与企业合规改革的方式和作用不同;未来可能建立的企业缓刑制度,能够为法院主导企业合规提供制度保障。法院参与企业合规改革的三种不同路径,会有各自的特点与优劣,也会面临不同的课题。The basic paths of court's participation in enterprise compliance reform include sentencing procedure,withdrawal of prosecution procedure and the possible construction of enterprise probation system in the future.In the sentencing procedure,the court examines and confirms the compliance results of enterprises led by procuratorate.Withdrawal of prosecution procedure provides a way to meet the needs of enterprise compliance in the trial stage,but the way and role of judges participating in enterprise compliance reform are different in different reform ideas.The enterprise probation system that may be established in the future can provide institutional guarantee for the court to lead the enterprise compliance.The three different paths of court participation in enterprise compliance reform have their own characteristics,advantages and disadvantages,and will also face different problems.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222