文学记忆:“自我”的面相及其表征意义  

Literary Memory: the Face of "Self" and its Representational Meaning

作　　者：卢永和[1] LU Yong-he(College of Chinese Language and Literature,Zhaoqing University,Zhaoqing 526061,China)

机构地区：[1]肇庆学院文学院,广东肇庆526061

出　　处：《井冈山大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第1期107-113,共7页Journal of Jinggangshan University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：广东省哲学社会科学规划学科共建项目“记忆诗学的理论谱系与艺术表征研究”(项目编号:GD18XZW14)。

摘　　要：美国社会心理学家米德将“自我”分为“主我”与“客我”两个面相,此观点有助于理解文学记忆叙述中的“自我”意涵。从“客我”层面而言,“见证文学”中回忆的“自我”,是社会表征的一个符号;而《忏悔录》中回忆的“自我”,既是一个“主我”(独特的文学典型),亦是一个“客我”(浸染时代精神的社会人)。詹姆斯与伯格森的“自我”意识理论,可以用来解释两种不同风格的意识流文学。文学中的“自我”回忆,既是指向叙述主体之自身的回忆,亦是指涉自身所属群体的回忆。The American social psychologist George Herbert Mead divides the"self"into the"I"and the"Me".This view helps us understand the meaning of"self"in the narrative of literary memory.From the perspective of the"Me",the"self"recalled in"literature as testimony"is a symbol of social collective representation.The"self"recalled in Confessions is not only the"I",that is,a unique literary model,but also the"Me",that is,a social person infused with the spirit of the times.James and Bergson's theory of self-consciousness can be used to explain two different styles of stream-of-consciousness literature.The"self"recollection in literature refers to both the individual recollection of the narrative subject itself and the collective recollection of the group to which one belongs.

关 键 词：文学记忆 自我 主我 客我 

分 类 号：I01[文学—文学理论]