检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蒋艳艳[1] JIANG Yanyan(School of Humanities,Southeast University,Nanjing 210000,China)
出 处:《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》2023年第1期134-140,共7页Journal of Jishou University(Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目(20CZX060)。
摘 要:网络道德审判是对传统道德审判的继承与发展,存在着显著的伦理困境:它理应通过激发正向羞耻感来促进对行为者的伦理教化,但在诸多情况中却因引发负向羞耻感而产生对行为者的伦理排斥。网络道德审判作为一种典型的道德评价形态,可以利用情感主义伦理学中的旁观者视角来加以考察。据此可发现,网络旁观者的同情、想象、事实判断能力存在着诸多困境,同时其群体性特征又进一步加剧了潜在的风险。实现公正的网络道德审判,需要汲取和借鉴“公正的旁观者”的多重意蕴来构建可能的伦理进路。As the inheritance and development of the traditional moral trial,network moral trial faces a significant ethical dilemma.Reasonably,it should promote the ethical education of the actors by stimulating the positive sense of shame;however,in many cases,it leads to the ethical exclusion of actors because of the negative sense of shame.As a typical form of moral evaluation,network moral trial can be examined from the perspective of a spectator in emotionalist ethics,from which it can be found that there are many difficulties in the ability of sympathy,imagination and factual judgment of network spectators.At the same time,its group characteristics further aggravate the potential risks.In order to realize the fair network moral trial,we need to absorb and draw lessons from the multiple meanings of"just spectator"to construct the possible ethical approach.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.8.41