重大案件侦查终结前讯问合法性核查与非法证据排除之语境参差——兼论重大案件讯问核查的独立价值  

The Gaps between the Verification of the Interrogation Legality and the Exclusion of Illegal Evidence before Concluding the Investigation of Grave Cases——Independent Value of Interrogation and Verification in Grave Cases

作　　者：陈敏亚 朱严谨[2] 顾忠华[2] Chen Minya;Zhu Yanjin;Gu Zhonghua(People's Procuratorate of Minhang District,Shanghai 201199,China)

机构地区：[1]上海市闵行区人民检察院,上海201199 [2]上海市闵行区人民检察院第四检察部,上海201199

出　　处：《上海公安学院学报》2023年第1期77-84,共8页Journal of Shanghai Police College

摘　　要：重大案件侦查终结前讯问合法性核查制度随非法证据排除的不断推进应运而生,但因其规则设置中存在核查内容限缩、启动方式受限、核查窗口过窄、制度设计缺陷等情况未能与我国非法证据排除体系完全兼容。然而跳出思维桎梏来分析该项制度,可知其并非单纯地在排非规则羽翼下细化和落实方案,而是作为一种特殊的补充制度,从便宜性、荷载度、实效性、保护力等多方面考量均具有独立价值。从规则的演进、两种制度间的语境差异、前者的独立价值以及可进一步探索的优化完善方向出发,结合实务,通过对二元判断式规则、场景的预设及对策、数据赋能与人工智能等相关前景分析,提出完善与重塑方向。Before concluding the investigation of grave cases and with the continuous elimination of illegal evidence,the system of verifying the interrogation legality came into being.Because it was not fully compatible with the mechanism of eliminating illegal evidence,the verification contents are limited,the starting methods are limited,too,the verification reach is too narrow,and the system design has defects in its rule setting.However,when we analyze the system beyond the thinking restraints,we can see that it is not a simple act of refinement and implementation in the process of looking for irregular rules,which works as a special supplementary system with independent value from the perspective of cheapness,load,effectiveness,protection and etc.Starting with the rule evolution,the gaps between the two systems,the independent value of the former and by analyzing the relevant prospects of binary judgment rules,presetting scenarios and countermeasures,data empowerment and artificial intelligence,this paper combines theory with practice and further explores the direction of optimization and improvement.

关 键 词：重大案件 讯问合法性核查 非法证据排除 同步录音录像 

分 类 号：D915.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]