口腔医学硕士专业学位研究生生源质量的实证研究:基于指导医师对专业学位研究生综合评价的统计数据  

An empirical research on the enrollment quality of master of stomatology professional degree graduate students—Based on the statistical data of the comprehensive evaluation of professional degree graduate students by the guiding physicians

作　　者：潘沛[1,3] 刘芷尘[1,3] 王欣倍 严晓蕾 刘艳[1,3] 张伟 Pan Pei;Liu Zhichen;Wang Xinbei;Yan Xiaolei;Liu Yan;Zhang Wei(Clinical Medical School,Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200011,China;Resident and Specialist Standarized Training Office,Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200011,China;Center for Specialty Strategy Research of Shanghai Jiao Tong University China Hospital Development Institute,Shanghai 200011,China)

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院临床医学院,上海200011 [2]上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院规培办,上海200011 [3]上海交通大学中国医院发展研究院学科建设研究所,上海200011

出　　处：《中华医学教育探索杂志》2023年第1期21-25,共5页Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research

基　　金：全国医学专业学位研究生教育指导委员会课题(B2-YX20180404-02);上海市教育委员会研究生教育基金项目(沪学位办〔2017〕6号)。

摘　　要：目的:基于指导医师对专业学位研究生综合评价的统计数据对口腔医学硕士专业学位研究生生源质量进行实证研究。方法:对上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院67名口腔医学硕士专业学位研究生,在其出科时由其指导医师进行综合评价。使用SPSS 25.0进行t检验和方差分析。结果:67名学员综合评价平均得分为(91.39±3.55)分。综合评价指标具有较好的信度和效度。推免、统考、本校7年制转"5+3"和港澳台地区学生招录方式中,7年制转"5+3"培养学员的综合评价总分最高。初始成绩高分段学员的综合评价得分略高于低分段学员得分。学员本科就读高校为双一流高校和第四轮学科评估A、B档的学员得分较高。结论:应当重视生源质量,多渠道吸引优质生源,积极探索提高研究生生源质量的途径,同时努力夯实培训质量,并科学构建专业学位研究生综合考核评价体系,进一步深化"医教协同"内涵,促进口腔医学应用型高层次医学人才的培养与发展。Objective Based on the statistical data of the comprehensive evaluation of professional degree graduate students by the guiding physicians,to conduct an empirical study on the quality of the enrollment of master of stomatology professional degree graduate students.Methods A total of 67 master of stomatology professional degree graduate students from Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University were comprehensively evaluated by their guiding physicians when they went out the department.SPSS 25.0 software was used for t test and variance analysis.Results The average score of 67 students was(91.39±3.55)points.There was good reliability and validity for the comprehensive evaluation index.Among the methods of promotion and exemption,unified examination,7-year transfer to"5+3"of our school and enrollment of students from Hong Kong,Macao and Taiwan regions,the comprehensive evaluation total score of 7-year transfer to"5+3"of our school was the highest.The comprehensive evaluation results of the students with high initial scores were slightly higher than those students with low scores.The students who studied in the"Double First-class"universities and were with the fourth round of subject assessment grade A and grade B had better performances.Conclusion We should attach importance to enrollment quality,through various channels to attract quality students and actively explore ways to improve the quality of graduate students.Meanwhile,we should make efforts to strengthen training quality and to build scientific comprehensive evaluation system for specialized degree graduate students.The connotation of"medicine-education collaboration"will be further deepened.And the training and development of oral medicine applied high-level medical talents will be promoted.

关 键 词：口腔医学 "5+3" 生源质量 实证研究 

分 类 号：R-05[医药卫生]