检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨咏梅[1] 吴双 吴迪 Yang Yongmei;Wu Shuang;Wu Di
机构地区:[1]四川省成都市中级人民法院
出 处:《法治现代化研究》2023年第1期165-179,共15页Law and Modernization
摘 要:在现代司法愈趋专业化的背景之下,以更贴近普通民众为目标的小额诉讼程序因其快捷、低成本的特性迈入公众视野。2020年,最高人民法院将“完善小额诉讼程序”纳入民事诉讼程序繁简分流改革试点,通过广泛试点验证其制度功能,最终推动民事诉讼法对制度进行修改。对小额诉讼程序的评测不仅需要采取文献研究的方式,还需要与实证研究相结合。因而可以将作为试点法院的C市法院的相关案件数据作为切入点,在围绕小额诉讼程序适用标准、再审机制等问题展开讨论的基础之上,针对现实存在小额诉讼程序不好用、人们不愿用的问题,探索在民事案件审判实践中全流程优化小额诉讼程序的路径,为我国小额诉讼程序实现功能续造提供一定参考。In the context of the increasing specialization of modern justice, the small claims procedure, which is intended to come closer to the general public’s needs, have come into people’s life because of their fast speed and low cost. In 2020, China’s Supreme People’s Court included the “improvement of small claims procedure” in the pilot reform of streamlining civil proceedings, and tested its function through implementing extensive pilot projects. This will eventually lead to a revision of the Civil Procedure Law. The evaluation of the small claims procedure requires not only a literature-based approach but also a combination of empirical research. Therefore, we can proceed with the relevant case data from the pilot court in City C to examine the application criteria of the small claims procedure and the re-trial mechanism. On this basis, in response to the problem of poor quality and reluctance in the application of small claims procedure, we explore the path to optimizing the small claims procedure in the trial practice of civil cases, so as to provide some reference for the renewal of the function of the small claims procedure in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.173