检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:梁成盼 鲍丹 Liang Cheng-pan;Bao Dan(Wuxi Central Rehabilitation Hospital/Mental Health Center Affiliated to Jiangnan University,Wuxi 214151,Jiangsu Province,China)
机构地区:[1]无锡市中心康复医院/江南大学附属精神卫生中心,江苏无锡214151
出 处:《中国社区医师》2023年第5期25-27,共3页Chinese Community Doctors
摘 要:目的:探讨神经促通技术联合脑反射治疗脑卒中的效果。方法:选取2021年1月—2022年6月无锡市中心康复医院收治的58例脑卒中患者作为研究对象,根据随机数字表法分为观察组与对照组,各29例。对照组实施传统康复治疗,观察组实施神经促通技术联合脑反射治疗。比较两组运动功能、神经功能、言语功能、治疗效果。结果:治疗前,两组改良Barthel指数(MBI)、Berg平衡量表(BBS)、Fugl-Meyer评定量表(FMA)评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,观察组MBI、BBS、FMA评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前,两组美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)、功能性语言沟通能力检查法(CFCP)评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,观察组NIHSS评分低于对照组,CFCP评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P=0.000)。观察组治疗总有效率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P=0.037)。结论:对脑卒中患者实施神经促通技术联合脑反射治疗的效果显著,可提高患者运动功能,改善神经功能与言语功能。Objective:To investigate the effect of nerve facilitation technique combined with brain reflex treatment of stroke.Methods:A total of 58 stroke patients admitted to Wuxi Central Rehabilitation Hospital from January 2021 to June 2022 were selected as research subjects,and they were divided into observation group and control group according to random number table method,with 29 cases in each group.The control group implemented the traditional rehabilitation treatment,and the observation group implemented the nerve facilitation technique combined with brain reflex treatment.The motor function,nerve function,speech function and treatment effect of the two groups were compared.Results:Before treatment,there was no significant difference in the modified Barthel index(MBI),Berg Balance Scale(BBS),and Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale(FMA)scores between two groups(P>0.05);after treatment,MBI,BBS,and FMA scores in the observation group were higher than those in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Before treatment,there was no significant difference in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale(NIHSS)and Chinese Functional Communication Profile(CFCP)scores between the two groups(P>0.05).After treatment,the NIHSS score in the observation group was lower than that in the control group,and the CFCP score in the observation group was higher than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P=0.000).The overall effective rate of treatment in the observation group was higher than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P=0.037).Conclusion:The effect of nerve facilitation technique combined with brain reflex in the treatment of stroke patients is significant,it can enhance motor function and improve nerve function and speech function.
分 类 号:R743.3[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.132.143