慎诉视域下不起诉裁量权的困境与纾解  

Dilemmas and Solutions of Prosecutorial Discretion in the Context of Caution

作　　者：金晴 JIN Qing(Criminal Justice College,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学刑事法学院,上海200042

出　　处：《湖北工业职业技术学院学报》2023年第1期36-42,共7页Journal of Hubei Industrial Polytechnic

摘　　要：2021年少捕慎诉慎押由刑事司法理念上升为刑事司法政策,慎诉政策的提出为不起诉裁量权的内涵注入了新的理解,也为检察官行使不起诉裁量权提出了更高的要求。但通过实证研究和域外比较发现,由于立法供给不足、司法程序抑制和传统观念束缚,我国不起诉裁量权运作上仍处于适用不足的状况。欲破解运行困境,有必要扩充立法空间、完善司法程序、适用配套措施并健全监督机制,使不起诉裁量权发挥应有的价值功能。In 2021,“less arrest,careful prosecution and careful detention”was upgraded from a concept to a policy.The proposal of caution injects a new understanding of non prosecution discretion,and requires more for exercising it.However,empirical research and extraterritorial comparison show that there is still an insufficient application of non prosecution discretion in our country due to the deficient legislative supply,suppression of judicial procedures,and shackles of traditional ideas.In order to address the dilemmas,it is necessary to expand the legislative space,optimize the judicial procedures,apply supporting measures and improve the supervision mechanism.

关 键 词：慎诉 不起诉裁量权 相对不起诉 附条件不起诉 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]