检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周绪琳 李跃平[2] ZHOU Xulin;LI Yueping(General Education Centre,Quanzhou University of Information Engineering,Quanzhou 362000,Fujian,China;Southwest Minzu University,Chengdu 610041 Sichuan,China)
机构地区:[1]泉州信息工程学院通识教育中心,福建泉州362000 [2]西南民族大学,四川成都610041
出 处:《西南科技大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2023年第1期75-83,共9页Journal of Southwest University of Science and Technology:Philosophy and Social Science Edition
摘 要:以中国英语学习者语料库的数据为研究语料,以鲁汶母语者语料库为参照,探讨了中国英语学习者V-ing类形容词的习得特征:在V-ing类形容词的习得单词宽度和总频次方面,中国英语学习者与母语者存在极其显著的差异,中国英语学习者超高频地使用developing等分词形容词;在结构特征中,使用“V-ing类分词形容词+名词”这一类联接时,两个群体间存在极其显著的差异;在比较和补足语这两类联接中,两个群体的习得情况除了动词不定式外,其他方面几乎没有差异。教学中,我们需要唤起学生的注意,让他们更多地关注V-ing类分词形容词;让学生基于多词序列角度学习V-ing类分词形容词;需要增加V-ing分词形容词的激活频次。Using corpus to explore learners’ acquisition of V-ing type adjectives. A corpus-based study was conducted of Chinese learners’ acquisition characteristics of V-ing adjectives on the basis of the data from CLEC and LOCNESS. The results run as follows: There exist remarkable difference between the two learner groups in terms of the width of words and total frequency of V-ing adjectives. As regards the colligation, remarkable difference is found in the acquisition of V-ing adjective + Noun phrases while there has no difference between the two learner groups with regard to the comparison and complementation with the exception of the infinitive. While teaching,we should get students to pay more attention to V-ing type adjectives and master them on the basis of multi-word expression. Additionally, we should increase the frequency of activating such adjectives.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.58