《文心雕龙·原道》篇之义蕴探微  

Analysis about the Meaning of Yuan Dao of Wenxin Diaolong

作　　者：侯光耀 兰祥苹 Hou Guangyao;Lan Xiangping(College of Art,Shandong University,Jinan,Shandong,250100;Chongqing Yucai Middle School,Chongqing,400050)

机构地区：[1]山东大学文学院,山东济南250100 [2]重庆育才中学,重庆400050

出　　处：《语文学刊》2023年第1期1-5,共5页Journal of Language and Literature Studies

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“《文心雕龙》汇释及百年‘龙学’学案”(17ZD253)子课题“《文心雕龙》精义今释”阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：历来对《原道》篇中“道”的内涵的解读呈现出一种复杂性和多样性的特点,但仅仅将之归于一家之说的见解都是有失片面的。结合《文心雕龙》全书去细究刘勰的思想,其所说之“道”应更近于魏晋玄学兴起以来所形成的融合儒道于一家的新“易”学。从文与道的关系看,刘勰主张文源于道、文道并重,这有别于重道轻文的“文以载道”说;从背景和目的看,刘勰主张原道,既是为了矫正当时绮靡的形式主义文风,也有着满足特定时期皇权政治需要的考虑。The interpretation of the connotation of “Dao” in the traditional interpretationin has always been complex and diverse. But the notion that this is just a statement is one-sided. To study Liu Xie’s thoughts in detail, in combination with the book WenXin DiaoLong. The “Dao” he said, should be closer to the new “Yi” formed since the rise of metaphysics in Wei and Jin Dynasties, which integrated Confucianism and Taoism.From the perspective of the relationship between literature and Dao, Liu Xie advocated that literature originates from Dao and attaches equal importance to both literature and Dao. This is different from the “writings are for conveying truth” theory, which emphasizes the Dao and ignores the literature. In terms of context and purpose, Liu Xie advocated the original way. In order to correct the formalism style at that time.There were also considerations to satisfy the political needs of the imperial power at a particular time.

关 键 词：刘勰 《文心雕龙》 原道 内涵 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]