主动管理空气消毒机效果分析  

Effect analysis of active management of air disinfection equipment

作　　者：司慧君[1] 张旋 薛鸿[2] 许丽荣[2] 韩伟[2] 郭剑[2] 张珲娉 SI Hui-jun;ZHANG Xuan;XUE Hong;XU Li-rong;HAN Wei;GUO Jian;ZHANG Hui-pin(The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University,Xi’an 710004,Shaanxi,China;Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital,Xi’an 710068,Shaanxi,China;Shaanxi Province Cancer Hospital,Xi’an 710061,Shaanxi,China)

机构地区：[1]西安交通大学第二附属医院,陕西西安710004 [2]陕西省人民医院,陕西西安710068 [3]陕西省肿瘤医院,陕西西安710061

出　　处：《生物医学工程与临床》2023年第2期232-237,共6页Biomedical Engineering and Clinical Medicine

摘　　要：目的通过加强空气消毒机购置后的一系列主动管理措施,改善空气消毒机的日常工作状态,保障临床科室的空气质量。方法选择某三甲医院3个科室使用的73台壁挂式高压静电场空气消毒机(深圳某厂生产),其中Ⅱ类环境的介入手术室15台,Ⅲ类环境的肾病透析中心和普通内科病区分别为18台、40台。开展空气消毒机的使用培训、相关政策法规学习培训与考核,并建立科室双向随访响应评估制度,对上述主动管理措施实施前后空气消毒机的设备开机率、设备故障率、设备报修率和前置过滤网质量进行对比研究。结果普通内科病区主动管理前,空气消毒机设备开机率58.4%,设备故障率72.5%,设备报修率10.3%;主动管理后,设备开机率89.1%,设备故障率25.0%,设备报修率100.0%;主动管理前后设备开机率、设备故障率、设备报修率比较,差异有显著统计学意义(P=0.000)。肾病透析中心主动管理前,空气消毒机设备开机率64.6%,设备故障率19.4%,设备报修率28.6%;主动管理后,设备开机率91.0%,设备故障率8.3%,设备报修率100.0%;主动管理前后比较,差异有显著统计学意义(P=0.000)。介入手术室主动管理前,空气消毒机设备开机率77.5%,设备故障率20.0%,设备报修率100.0%;主动管理后,设备开机率95.8%,设备故障率13.3%,设备报修率100.0%;主动管理前后比较,开机率差异有显著统计学意义(P=0.000);设备故障率和设备报修率虽有差异,但差异无统计学意义。主动管理前,普通内科病区、肾病透析中心、介入手术室前置过滤网质量分别为(8.88±1.00)g、(8.51±0.78)g、(10.17±1.50)g,主动管理后普通内科病区、肾病透析中心、介入手术室前置过滤网质量分别为(10.72±0.86)g、(11.78±0.70)g、(10.73±0.64)g。普通内科病区、肾病透析中心、介入手术室前置过滤网质量明显高于主动管理前,其中普通内科病区、肾病透析中心前置过滤网质Objective To improve the daily working status of air disinfector and ensure air quality of clinical departments by strengthening a series of active management measures after purchase of air disinfector. Methods A total of 73 sets of wallmounted high-voltage electrostatic field air disinfection equipment(made in Shenzhen) used in 3 departments of a tertiary firstclass hospital were selected, which included 15 in Interventional Operation Room in Class Ⅱ environment, 18 Nephropathy Dialysis Center and 40 General Internal Medicine Ward in Class Ⅲ environment. The operation training of air disinfection machine, relevant policies and regulations learning, training and assessment were performed, and two-way follow-up response evaluation system was established to compare the equipment operation rate, equipment failure rate, equipment repair rate and pre-filter quality of air disinfectors before and after active management measures. Results Before the implementation of active management in General Internal Medicine Ward, the equipment operation rate was 58.4 %, equipment failure rate was72.5 % and failure repair rate was 10.3 %. After the implementation, the equipment operation rate was 89.1 %, equipment failure rate was 25.0 % and failure repair rate was 100.0 %. There were significant differences in equipment operation rate,equipment failure rate and equipment repair rate before and after the implementation of active management(P = 0.000). Before the implementation of active management in Nephropathy Dialysis Center, the equipment operation rate was 64.6 %,equipment failure rate was 19.4 % and failure repair rate was 28.6 %. After the implementation, the equipment operation rate was 91.0 %, equipment failure rate was 8.3 % and failure repair rate was 100.0 %, and the differences before and after the implementation were significant(P = 0.000). Before the implementation of active management in Interventional Operation Room,the equipment operation rate was 77.5 %, equipment failure rate was 20.0 % and failure repair ra

关 键 词：主动管理 空气消毒机 故障率 报修率 前置过滤网 管理效果 

分 类 号：R197.32[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]