扎根理论在国内人文社会科学应用现状分析  

Analysis the Application Situation of Grounded Theory in Humanities and Social Sciences

作　　者：魏瑞斌[1] 李博文 田大芳[2] WEI Ruibin;LI Bowen;TIAN Dafang(School of Management Science and Engineering,Anhui University of Finance and Economics,Bengbu 233030;Anhui University of Finance and Economics Library,Bengbu,233030)

机构地区：[1]安徽财经大学管理科学与工程学院,蚌埠233030 [2]安徽财经大学图书馆,蚌埠233030

出　　处：《科技情报研究》2023年第2期1-12,共12页Scientific Information Research

基　　金：国家社会科学基金资助项目“情报学研究方法的知识图谱构建及其应用场景推荐研究”(编号:20BTQ044)。

摘　　要：[目的/意义]扎根理论是质性研究中重要的研究方法。通过梳理该方法在国内人文社会科学领域应用现状,为使用该研究方法的研究者提供参考。[方法/过程]首先,从中国知网期刊全文数据库收集了860篇期刊论文相关信息。然后,利用文献计量与内容分析方法对论文相关信息进行分析。[结果/结论]研究发现,利用扎根理论研究的论文数量经过一个快速增长阶段后,达到一个较为稳定的状态;该领域的发文期刊、作者和关键词等分布都呈现出一个非常明显的集中与分散状态。该方法在应用过程中还存在编码过程不规范、饱和度检验缺失等问题。[Purpose/significance]Grounded theory is an important research method in qualitative research.By sorting out the application status of this method in the field of humanities and social sciences in China,it will provide a reference for scholars who use this research method.[Method/process]First,860 journal articles were retrieved from CNKI journal full-text database including"grounded theory"in the title,and the published journals were CSSCI source journals.Then,bibliometric and content analysis methods were used to analyze the relevant information.[Result/conclusion]It was found that the number of papers researched using rooting theory reached a more stable state after a rapid growth phase;the distribution of journals,authors and keywords etc.In this field is very obvious in a state of concentration and dispersion.There are also problems in the application of the method such as non-standardization of the coding process and lack of saturation test.

关 键 词：扎根理论 研究方法 质性研究 文献计量 内容分析 

分 类 号：G353[文化科学—情报学]