中国FDI与制造业GVC地位的关系研究—基于经济高质量发展视角  

Research on the Relationship between China’s FDI and GVC Position in Manufacturing--From the Perspective of High-quality Economic Development

作　　者：何达开 王维然 HE Dakai;WANG Weiran(Xinjiang Normal University,Urumqi Xinjiang 830017,China)

机构地区：[1]新疆师范大学商学院,新疆乌鲁木齐830017

出　　处：《北京经济管理职业学院学报》2023年第1期38-44,共7页Journal of Beijing Institute of Economics And Management

摘　　要：文章基于经济高质量发展的视角,从理论层面论述FDI、GVC以及经济高质量发展之间的内在机理:FDI主要从示范模范效应(技术知识溢出效应)、竞争效应、人力资本流动效应以及产业关联效应对东道国GVC地位产生影响。利用OECD-TIVA数据库,测算中国制造业的GVC地位与参与指数,发现制造业实际使用FDI与制造业GVC地位变动趋势相反,FDI的引入并未改善制造业GVC分工地位。进一步研究发现,在技术密集型、资本密集型与劳动密集型制造业中,技术密集型制造业GVC地位最低,GVC参与度最高;劳动密集型制造业GVC地位最高,GVC参与度最低。在低技术、中低技术、中高技术以及高技术制造业中,高技术制造业GVC地位最低,GVC参与度最高;低技术制造业GVC地位最高,GVC参与度最低。最后,提出未来优化制造业FDI是提升GVC地位的主要路径。The paper discusses the internal mechanism of FDI,GVC,and high-quality economic development from the perspective of high-quality economic development.According to the OECD-TIVA database,the manufacturing industry is divided by technology,capital,and labor factor intensity,and the corresponding GVC status and participation index are calculated.It is found that the GVC position in technology-intensive manufacturing is at a low level,while the GVC position in labor-intensive manufacturing is relatively high.Further according to the technical level,the GVC status and participation index were calculated,which showed that in high-tech manufacturing,the GVC position was the lowest and GVC participation was the highest.GVC has the highest division and the lowest participation in labor-intensive manufacturing.Moreover,FDI cannot improve the GVC position in the manufacturing industry through the positive spillover effect,and the low-end lock-in effect is more prominent in the manufacturing industry.Therefore,China needs to improve the quality and threshold of manufacturing FDI,optimize the allocation of production factors,and enhance the basic innovation capacity of the high-tech manufacturing industry.

关 键 词：经济高质量 FDI 制造业 GVC 

分 类 号：F424[经济管理—产业经济]