我国英语教材研究60年述评——基于CiteSpace知识图谱的可视化分析  

English teaching materials research in China in the past 60 years:A visualized analysis with CiteSpace

作　　者：常畅 杨鲁新[2] CHANG Chang;YANG Luxin

机构地区：[1]北京外国语大学国际教育学院,北京100089 [2]北京外国语大学中国外语教材研究中心、英语学院,北京100089

出　　处：《外语界》2023年第1期76-83,共8页Foreign Language World

基　　金：北京外国语大学“双一流”建设重大项目“全球外语教材研究与资源建设:多维视角下的大中小学外语教材研究”(编号2022SYLZD014);2021年度中国外语教材研究专项课题“外语教材政策落实研究”的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：本文以我国15种外语类核心期刊的270篇论文为数据来源,借助可视化分析软件CiteSpace,采用定量与定性相结合方法述评1962—2022年国内英语教材研究。结果显示,研究论文数量呈现“过山车”式发展趋势,且在期刊论文总量中占比较小;研究视角注重宏观理论探讨和客位研究者观察,多学科综合剖析缺乏;研究主题涉及教材编写、使用、分析、评估、研发等方面,但系统性欠缺;研究方法以定量研究为主,定性和混合研究匮乏。未来研究应注重内容覆盖面、视角立体化及范式动态转向和智能转向。Supported by CiteSpace, this quantitative-qualitative study reviews 270 papers on English teaching materials published in China’s 15 key foreign language journals from 1962 to 2022, and the results present the status quo of English teaching materials research in the past 60 years. Relevant studies have been increasing in “rollercoaster” fluctuation, but occupy a relatively small percentage in the total of published journal papers. Research perspectives highlight macro-theoretical discussion and etic-researcher investigation, but feature a paucity of multi-disciplinary exploration. Research content falls into categories of teaching materials compilation, use, analysis, evaluation and development, but lacks systematic and comprehensive interpretation. Research paradigms are basically quantitative, and short of qualitative or mixed-method inquires. Researchers in the future should push for the systematization of content, multidimensionality of perspectives, and dynamic and AI turn of paradigms.

关 键 词：英语教材 前沿热点 CITESPACE 可视化分析 

分 类 号：H319[语言文字—英语]