中日学界关于中国金文研究的互动  

Sino-Japanese Academic Interaction in the Research on Chinese Bronze Inscriptions

作　　者：李无未[1] 周士瑶 Li Wuwei;Zhou Shiyao

机构地区：[1]厦门大学中文系

出　　处：《国际汉学》2023年第2期86-94,157,158,共11页International Sinology

基　　金：国家哲学社会科学基金冷门绝学研究专项学术团队项目“东亚汉语音韵学史文献发掘与研究”(项目编号:21VJXT014)成果之一。

摘　　要：贝塚茂树与白川静分别写有金文学史,力图客观而全景式地展现金文学发展史,并无“国别”与“域别”之分,但他们站在日本学者的立场,“隐形”地流露日本化中国金文学史的意识。白川静认为,郭沫若运用考古学研究方法研究古文字,明显受到滨田耕作《泉屋清赏》商周铜器“形态样式”理论与考释方法影响。本文从梅原末治等与郭沫若、容庚的学术互动,以及滨田耕作、梅原末治金文学贡献谈起,力图缕清中日之间的这种学术关系,并对中日近现代古文字学术关系史研究提出个人的看法。Kaizuka Shigeki and Shirakawa Shizuka each wrote a history of bronze inscriptions studies,trying to present the development of bronze inscriptions studies in an objective and panoramic way without any distinction between country and region.They stood,however,in the position of Japanese scholars and invisibly established a Japanized awareness of the history of Chinese bronze inscriptions studies.Shirakawa Shizuka thought that Guo Moruo’s study of ancient characters with archaeological research methods was obviously influenced by the theory of the“morphological style”of the Shang and Zhou bronzeware in Hamada Kosaku’s Spring House Appreciation.This article starts with the academic interactions between Umehara Sueji et al.and Guo Moruo and Rong Geng,as well as the contributions of Hamada Kosaku and Umehara Sueji to bronze inscriptions studies,trying to sort out the academic relationship between China and Japan and putting forward a different perspective on studies of the history of academic relations regarding ancient Chinese characters between China and Japan in modern times.

关 键 词：日本化 金文学史 中日学术互动 

分 类 号：H121[语言文字—汉语]