检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:熊芳藩 陈良武 XIONG Fangfan;CHEN Liangwu(School of Chinese Language and Literature,Minnan Normal University,Zhangzhou 363000,China)
出 处:《集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2023年第2期36-45,共10页Journal of Jimei University:Philosophy and Social Sciences
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(22BZW049)。
摘 要:先秦时期,儒家和道家围绕言意关系进行了大量讨论。通过分析传世文献与出土文献中有关儒、道两家言意观的记载,可知其中既有共通又有不同。一方面,先秦儒家与道家在“言”与“意”的表达问题上持相同观点,即“言表意但不尽意”;在“言”“意”两者之间,儒家与道家都表现出重“意”轻“言”的特点。另一方面,出于对“意”的重视,儒、道两家从不同角度对“言”如何尽“意”进行了探索,儒家的探索主要以“建构”的方法进行,而道家与之相反,选择了以“解构”的方式来追求“言尽意”。In the pre-Qin period,had lots of discussions about the relationship between language and meaning.An analysis of the related records in the handed-down and unearthed literature reveals that Confucianism and Taoism have lots of similarities and differences in their view.On the one hand,they held the same view on the expression of meaning,that is,the language could express but could not fully express the meaning.At the same time,both attached importance to meaning but despised language.On the other hand,because of their emphasis on meaning,they probed in different ways into the issue about how language could fully express meaning,with Confucianism by way of construction and Taoism through deconstruction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49